Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21725052›Full record

Trial reportBlood2011

Safety and efficacy of everolimus, a mTOR inhibitor, as single agent in a phase 1/2 study in patients with myelofibrosis.

Paola Guglielmelli, Giovanni Barosi, Alessandro Rambaldi, Roberto Marchioli, Arianna Masciulli, Lorenzo Tozzi, Flavia Biamonte, Niccolò Bartalucci, Elisabetta Gattoni, Maria Letizia Lupo and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Janus kinase-1 and Janus kinase-2 inhibitors for treating myelofibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. JAK Inhibitors for Myelofibrosis: Strengths and Limitations.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Novel Therapies in Myelofibrosis: Beyond JAK Inhibitors.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2022
    Review
  8. Novel treatments for myelofibrosis: beyond JAK inhibitors.International journal of hematology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Molecular pathogenesis of the myeloproliferative neoplasms.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis.Current treatment options in oncology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Paola GuglielmelliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Care, Section of Hematology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giovanni Barosi
Alessandro Rambaldi
Roberto Marchioli
Arianna Masciulli
Lorenzo Tozzi
Flavia Biamonte
Niccolò Bartalucci
Elisabetta Gattoni
Maria Letizia Lupo
Guido Finazzi
Alessandro Pancrazzi
Elisabetta Antonioli
Maria Chiara Susini
Lisa Pieri
Elisa Malevolti
Emilio Usala
Ubaldo Occhini
Alberto Grossi
Silvia Caglio
Simona Paratore
Alberto Bosi
Tiziano Barbui
Alessandro M Vannucchi
AIRC-Gruppo Italiano Malattie Mieloproliferative (AGIMM) investigators
Tumour Institute of Tuscany · ITUniversity of Bergamo · ITUniversity of Florence · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMario Negri Sud Foundation · ITNovartis (Italy) · ITNuovo Ospedale di Prato · ITOspedale San Donato · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to dysregulated JAK/STAT signaling, activation of the AKT/mTOR pathway occurs in myelofibrosis, a myeloproliferative neoplasm with no approved therapies. We conducted a phase 1/2 study with everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in 39 high- or intermediate-risk primary or postpolycythemia vera/postessential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis subjects. Responses were evaluated in 30 patients of phase 2. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in phase 1 up to 10 mg/d. When this dose was used in phase 2, grade ≥ 3 toxicities were infrequent; the commonest toxicity was grade 1-2 stomatitis. Rapid and sustained splenomegaly reduction of > 50% and > 30% occurred in 20% and 44% of subjects, respectively. A total of 69% and 80% experienced complete resolution of systemic symptoms and pruritus. Response in leukocytosis, anemia, and thrombocytosis occurred in 15%-25%. Clinical responses were not associated with reduced JAK2V617F burden, circulating CD34(+) cells, or cytokine levels, whereas CCDN1 mRNA and phospho-p70S6K level, known targets of mTOR, and WT1 mRNA were identified as possible biomarkers associated with response. Response rate was 60% when European Network for Myelofibrosis criteria were used (8 major, 7 moderate, 3 minor responses) or 23% when IWG-MRT criteria (1 partial response, 6 clinical improvements) were used. These results provide proof-of-concept that targeting mTOR pathway in myelofibrosis may be clinically relevant.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCyclin D1EverolimusFemaleHumansJanus Kinase 2MaleMiddle AgedMutationPolycythemia VeraPrimary MyelofibrosisProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptors, ThrombopoietinRNA, MessengerSignal TransductionCCND1 protein, humanCyclin D1EverolimusJAK2 protein, humanJanus Kinase 2MPL protein, humanMTOR protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptors, ThrombopoietinRNA, MessengerSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesWT1 Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21725052
PMCPMC3365876
OpenAlexW1985809519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.