[Health care pressure and redistribution of tasks: an opportunity to improve primary care].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Nurse management of minor problems in primary care emergencies: a non-randomized controlled trial.BMC nursing · 2025
   Article
2. [Primary Health Care, adequacy of quotas and Family Care Units. A flexible model according to complexity and sociodemographic characteristics].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2024
   Article
3. The evolution of the role of nursing in primary health care using Bourdieu's concept of habitus. A grounded theory study.PloS one · 2022
   Article
4. [Evaluation of Nurse Demand Management in Primary Care].Atencion primaria · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  [Primary care consultations: are they all by the doctor?].2011

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as