Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21722576›Full record

ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2011

Implant healing in experimental animal models of diabetes.

Nga N Le, Michael B Rose, Howard Levinson, Bruce Klitzman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanisms of Foreign Body Response Mitigation by Nitric Oxide Release.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nga N LeDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Kenan Plastic Surgery Research Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. klitz@duke.edu
Michael B Rose
Howard Levinson
Bruce Klitzman
Duke University Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

BIOSENSOR BIOCOMPATIBILITYR01DK054932 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI REICHERT, WILLIAM MONTGOMERY · 1999 to 2013
$4.2M
Nitric Oxide-Releasing Glucose BiosensorsR01EB000708 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SCHOENFISCH, MARK H · 2002 to 2011
$3.1M
Biosensor BiocompatibilityR56DK054932 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI REICHERT, WILLIAM MONTGOMERY · 2008 to 2008
$258k
NIBIB NIH HHS EB000708NIDDK NIH HHS DK54932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide. Additionally, there is an increasing number of patients receiving implantable devices such as glucose sensors and orthopedic implants. Thus, it is likely that the number of diabetic patients receiving these devices will also increase. Even though implantable medical devices are considered biocompatible by the Food and Drug Administration, the adverse tissue healing that occurs adjacent to these foreign objects is a leading cause of their failure. This foreign body response leads to fibrosis, encapsulation of the device, and a reduction or cessation of device performance. A second adverse event is microbial infection of implanted devices, which can lead to persistent local and systemic infections and also exacerbates the fibrotic response. Nearly half of all nosocomial infections are associated with the presence of an indwelling medical device. Events associated with both the foreign body response and implant infection can necessitate device removal and may lead to amputation, which is associated with significant morbidity and cost. Diabetes mellitus is generally indicated as a risk factor for the infection of a variety of implants such as prosthetic joints, pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, penile implants, and urinary catheters. Implant infection rates in diabetic patients vary depending upon the implant and the microorganism, however, for example, diabetes was found to be a significant variable associated with a nearly 7.2% infection rate for implantable cardioverter defibrillators by the microorganism Candida albicans. While research has elucidated many of the altered mechanisms of diabetic cutaneous wound healing, the internal healing adjacent to indwelling medical devices in a diabetic model has rarely been studied. Understanding this healing process is crucial to facilitating improved device design. The purpose of this article is to summarize the physiologic factors that influence wound healing and infection in diabetic patients, to review research concerning diabetes and biomedical implants and device infection, and to critically analyze which diabetic animal model might be advantageous for assessing internal healing adjacent to implanted devices.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAnimalsBiosensing TechniquesBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringCandidiasisCross InfectionCytokinesDefibrillators, ImplantableDiabetes ComplicationsFibrosisHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsOrthopedicsProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis FailureBlood GlucoseCytokinesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21722576
PMCPMC3192627
OpenAlexW2057535463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.