ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2011
Pediatric diabetes registries: when baby steps are not enough.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishing the Saudi pediatric and youth diabetes registry: initial data and challenges.Sudanese journal of paediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective diabetes research relies on pattern recognition. Although information technology (IT) has been used to aid researchers in recognizing patterns, there are still barriers to effective data collection, analysis, and collaboration inherent in using outdated methods and technology designed to fulfill clinical, not research, purposes. This article discusses seven problems with current research and outlines a solution in which innovative IT can be harnessed to overcome each problem, resulting in better research outcomes. New IT solutions on the market, such as meta-registries, are designed specifically to handle the complex data collection and analysis problems associated with diabetes research. A meta-registry with an ontology automatically harmonizes data from disparate sources, allowing researchers to devote their time to pattern recognition. With all essential data centralized and harmonized, researchers are also provided with a more complete view of each patient or research subject. When researchers can view and report across all data types at the same time, they are able to discover patterns and associations that are indistinguishable using traditional methodologies. This capability proves extremely beneficial, particularly for multifactorial disease research such as diabetes research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.