Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21722572›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2011

Pediatric diabetes registries: when baby steps are not enough.

Chad Malone, Gary D Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chad MaloneRemedyMD, Sandy, Utah, USA. cmalone@remedymd.com
Gary D Kennedy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective diabetes research relies on pattern recognition. Although information technology (IT) has been used to aid researchers in recognizing patterns, there are still barriers to effective data collection, analysis, and collaboration inherent in using outdated methods and technology designed to fulfill clinical, not research, purposes. This article discusses seven problems with current research and outlines a solution in which innovative IT can be harnessed to overcome each problem, resulting in better research outcomes. New IT solutions on the market, such as meta-registries, are designed specifically to handle the complex data collection and analysis problems associated with diabetes research. A meta-registry with an ontology automatically harmonizes data from disparate sources, allowing researchers to devote their time to pattern recognition. With all essential data centralized and harmonized, researchers are also provided with a more complete view of each patient or research subject. When researchers can view and report across all data types at the same time, they are able to discover patterns and associations that are indistinguishable using traditional methodologies. This capability proves extremely beneficial, particularly for multifactorial disease research such as diabetes research.

Indexed as

Data CollectionRegistriesChildDiabetes MellitusHumansInternetMedical InformaticsMultivariate AnalysisOutcome Assessment, Health CarePediatricsResearch DesignSoftwareStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID21722572
PMCPMC3192623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.