Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21722447›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2011

Trends in doctors' early career choices for general practice in the UK: longitudinal questionnaire surveys.

Trevor Lambert, Michael Goldacre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Time for a little self-love?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  8. Shortage of Physicians: A Critical Review.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  9. Revealing the reality of undergraduate GP teaching in UK medical curricula: a cross-sectional questionnaire study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Innovating undergraduate pathology education through public engagement.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Trends in attractiveness of general practice as a career: surveys of views of UK-trained doctors.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  19. Exposure of undergraduates to authentic GP teaching and subsequent entry to GP training: a quantitative study of UK medical schools.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Trevor LambertUK Medical Careers Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. trevor.lambert@dph.ox.ac.uk
Michael Goldacre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe percentage of newly qualified doctors in the UK who want a career in general practice declined substantially in the 1990s. The English Department of Health expects that half of all doctors will become GPs.

aimTo report on choices for general practice made by doctors who qualified in 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008, and 2009. DESIGN AND

settingA structured, closed questionnaire about future career intentions, sent to all UK medical graduates.

methodQuestionnaires sent 1 year after qualification (all cohorts) and 3 years after (all except 2008 and 2009).

resultsPercentages of doctors who expressed an unreserved first choice for general practice in the first year after qualification, in the successive five cohorts, were 22.2%, 20.2%, 23.2%, 21.3%, and 20.4%. Percentages who expressed any choice for general practice - whether first, second or third - were 46.5%, 43.4%, 52.6%, 49.5%, and 49.9%. Three years after qualification, an unreserved first choice was expressed, in successive cohorts, by 27.9%, 26.1%, and 35.1%. Doctors from newly established English medical schools showed the highest levels of choice for general practice.

conclusionThe percentage of doctors, in their first post-qualification year, whose first choice of eventual career was general practice has not changed much in recent years. By year 3 after qualification, this preference has increased in recent years. At years 1 and 3, the overall first choice for general practice is considerably lower than the required 50%, but varies substantially by medical school. In depth studies of why this is so are needed.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceEducational StatusFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMedical Staff, HospitalPhysicians, FamilySchools, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID21722447
PMCPMC3123502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.