Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21722353›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2011

The mouse genetics toolkit: revealing function and mechanism.

Louise van der Weyden, Jacqueline K White, David J Adams, Darren W Logan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Breeding of CaScientific reports · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mutation of WIF1: a potential novel cause of a Nail-Patella-like disorder.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017
    Article
  8. Suppression ofeLife · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The genomic basis of vomeronasal-mediated behaviour.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. After GWAS: mice to the rescue?Current opinion in immunology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louise van der WeydenWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Jacqueline K White
David J Adams
Darren W Logan

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13031Medical Research Council G0800024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale projects are providing rapid global access to a wealth of mouse genetic resources to help discover disease genes and to manipulate their function.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsGenetic Association StudiesGenetic EngineeringGenomeMiceSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID21722353
PMCPMC3218837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.