Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21722215›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroendocrinology2011

A bold view of the lactating brain: functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of suckling in awake dams.

M Febo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Milkability in dam-calf contact systems.Translational animal science · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The maternal reward system in postpartum depression.Archives of women's mental health · 2019
    Review
  11. Social touch and human development.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M FeboDepartment of Psychiatry, The McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610-0256, USA. febo@ufl.edu
University of Florida · US

Funding

Brain Imaging of Cocaine and Maternal RewardR01DA019946 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI FEBO, MARCELO · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS DA019946NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been used to investigate the responsiveness of the maternal rat brain to pup-suckling under various experimental paradigms. Our research employing the lactating rat model has explored the cortical sensory processing of pup stimuli and the effect of suckling on the brain's reward system. Suckling was observed to increase blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal intensity in the midbrain, striatum and prefrontal cortex, which are areas that receive prominent dopaminergic inputs. The BOLD activation of the reward system occurs in parallel with the activation of extensive cortical sensory areas. The observed regions include the olfactory cortex, auditory cortex and gustatory cortex, and could correspond to cortical representations of pup odours, vocalisations and taste that are active during lactation. Activation patterns within reward regions are consistent with past research on maternal motivation and we explore the possibility that exposure to drugs of abuse might be disruptive of maternal neural responses to pups, particularly in the prefrontal cortex. Our ongoing fMRI studies support and extend past research on the maternal rat brain and its functional neurocircuitry.

Indexed as

Animals, SucklingLactationMothersAnimalsFemaleMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID21722215
PMCPMC3361731
OpenAlexW1858547413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.