Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21721711›Full record

ArticleThe Review of scientific instruments2011

A multiplexed immunoassay system based upon reciprocating centrifugal microfluidics.

Zahra Noroozi, Horacio Kido, Régis Peytavi, Rie Nakajima-Sasaki, Algimantas Jasinskas, Miodrag Micic, Philip L Felgner, Marc J Madou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Review of scientific instruments, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zahra NorooziDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 4200 Engineering Gateway, Irvine, California 92697-3975, USA.
Horacio Kido
Régis Peytavi
Rie Nakajima-Sasaki
Algimantas Jasinskas
Miodrag Micic
Philip L Felgner
Marc J Madou

Funding

Vaccines and Diagnostics TrialsU54AI065359 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BARBOUR, ALAN G. · 2005 to 2013
$88.8M
Multiplex Serodiagnostic Protein MicroarrayU01AI078213 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI FELGNER, PHILIP LOUIS · 2008 to 2012
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS 5U01AI078213-03NIAID NIH HHS 5U54AI065359-07NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI078213NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI065359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel, centrifugal disk-based micro-total analysis system (μTAS) for low cost and high throughput semi-automated immunoassay processing was developed. A key innovation in the disposable immunoassay disk design is in a fluidic structure that enables very efficient micro-mixing based on a reciprocating mechanism in which centrifugal acceleration acting upon a liquid element first generates and stores pneumatic energy that is then released by a reduction of the centrifugal acceleration, resulting in a reversal of direction of flow of the liquid. Through an alternating sequence of high and low centrifugal acceleration, the system reciprocates the flow of liquid within the disk to maximize incubation/hybridization efficiency between antibodies and antigen macromolecules during the incubation/hybridization stage of the assay. The described reciprocating mechanism results in a reduction in processing time and reagent consumption by one order of magnitude.

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialBurkholderiaCentrifugationHumansImmunoassayImmunoglobulin GIndicators and ReagentsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesTime FactorsAntigens, BacterialImmunoglobulin GIndicators and Reagents

Identifiers

PMID21721711
PMCPMC3188650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.