Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21720963›Full record

ReviewJournal of mathematical biology2012

Hyperbolic and kinetic models for self-organized biological aggregations and movement: a brief review.

Raluca Eftimie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mathematical biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mathematical models for cell migration: a non-local perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Multi-scale analysis and modelling of collective migration in biological systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The epidemiological models of Karl-Peter Hadeler.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Locust Collective Motion and Its Modeling.PLoS computational biology · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Raluca EftimieDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. reftimie@math.mcmaster.ca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We briefly review hyperbolic and kinetic models for self-organized biological aggregations and traffic-like movement. We begin with the simplest models described by an advection-reaction equation in one spatial dimension. We then increase the complexity of models in steps. To this end, we begin investigating local hyperbolic systems of conservation laws with constant velocity. Next, we proceed to investigate local hyperbolic systems with density-dependent speed, systems that consider population dynamics (i.e., birth and death processes), and nonlocal hyperbolic systems. We conclude by discussing kinetic models in two spatial dimensions and their limiting hyperbolic models. This structural approach allows us to discuss the complexity of the biological problems investigated, and the necessity for deriving complex mathematical models that would explain the observed spatial and spatiotemporal group patterns.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPopulation DynamicsKinetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.