Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21720862›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2012

Biopsy and treatment decisions in the initial management of prostate cancer and the role of PCA3; a systematic analysis of expert opinion.

Bertrand Tombal, Filip Ameye, Alexandre de la Taille, Theo de Reijke, Paolo Gontero, Alexander Haese, Paul Kil, Paul Perrin, Mesut Remzi, Jörg Schröder and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can urinary PCA3 supplement PSA in the early detection of prostate cancer?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Projecting Benefits and Harms of Novel Cancer Screening Biomarkers: A Study of PCA3 and Prostate Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer.Current opinion in urology · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Bertrand TombalService d'Urologie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc UCL, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium. bertrand.tombal@uclouvain.be
Filip Ameye
Alexandre de la Taille
Theo de Reijke
Paolo Gontero
Alexander Haese
Paul Kil
Paul Perrin
Mesut Remzi
Jörg Schröder
Mark Speakman
Alessandro Volpe
Bianca Meesen
Herman Stoevelaar
Academic Medical Center · NLAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita · ITCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLHôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor · FRMartini-Klinik · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATPraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DETaunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Prostate CAncer gene 3 (PCA3) assay may guide prostate biopsy decisions and predict prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness. This study explored the appropriateness of (1) PCA3 testing; (2) biopsy; (3) active surveillance (AS) and the value of the PCA3 Score for biopsy and AS decisions.

methodsUsing the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, 12 urologists assessed the appropriateness of PCA3, biopsy and AS for theoretical patient profiles, constructed by combining clinical variables. They individually scored the appropriateness for all profiles using a 9-point scale. Based on the median score and extent of agreement, the appropriateness for each profile was calculated.

resultsThe PCA3 Assay was mainly considered appropriate in men with ≥1 negative biopsy, PSA ≥ 3 ng/mL and life expectancy (LE) ≥10 years. A LE < 10 years, ≥2 negative biopsies and PCA3 Score <20 decreased biopsy appropriateness, while PSA ≥ 3 ng/mL and PCA3 Score >50 increased it. In men without a prior biopsy, LE ≥ 10 years and a suspicious DRE, PCA3 did not affect biopsy appropriateness. In other men, a PCA3 Score <20 discouraged biopsy, while a value ≥35 supported biopsy. AS was mainly considered appropriate if LE < 10 years, T1c PCa, ≤20% positive cores and PSA < 3 ng/mL. A PCA3 Score <20 pleads for and higher scores (particularly >50) against AS.

conclusionsThese findings illustrate in which men PCA3 can be of additional value when taking biopsy and treatment decisions in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAntigens, NeoplasmBiopsy, NeedleDecision MakingHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesAntigens, Neoplasmprostate cancer antigen 3, human

Identifiers

PMID21720862
OpenAlexW1989378496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.