Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21720318›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2011

Reproducible subcutaneous transplantation of cell sheets into recipient mice.

Haruko Obokata, Masayuki Yamato, Satoshi Tsuneda, Teruo Okano

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stem Cell Pathology.Annual review of pathology · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Endothelial cells enhance the in vivo bone-forming ability of osteogenic cell sheets.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haruko ObokataGraduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki Yamato
Satoshi Tsuneda
Teruo Okano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perfecting tissue engineering and cell sheet transplantation is an important step toward realizing regenerative medicine and is a growing area of research. Before being applied to clinical settings, it is important that these approaches are evaluated in vivo. Here we provide a detailed protocol for handling thin cell sheets, for a simple and highly reproducible subcutaneous transplantation of cell sheets into mice, and for the histological examination of regenerated tissues. Various aspects of transplants can be assessed, such as maintenance, differentiation and proliferation. An emphasis is placed on surgical precision and reproducibility. The resulting consistency between surgeries helps minimize artifacts from surgical variation and therefore enables researchers to not only observe and compare the interactions between host tissues but also to compare transplants among different host animals. A single transplantation can be carried out within ∼10 min.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell TransplantationHumansMaleMiceRatsRegenerative MedicineTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID21720318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.