Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21719796›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2011

Physiological response to membrane protein overexpression in E. coli.

Francesca Gubellini, Grégory Verdon, Nathan K Karpowich, Jon D Luff, Grégory Boël, Nils Gauthier, Samuel K Handelman, Sarah E Ades, John F Hunt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Engineered nickel bioaccumulation inEngineering in life sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Second-GenerationACS synthetic biology · 2022
    Article
  18. Efficient Robust Yield Method for Preparing Bacterial Ghosts byBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesca GubelliniDepartment of Biological Sciences, 702A Fairchild Center, MC2434, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Grégory Verdon
Nathan K Karpowich
Jon D Luff
Grégory Boël
Nils Gauthier
Samuel K Handelman
Sarah E Ades
John F Hunt
Columbia University · USCornell University · USInstitut Pasteur · FRNew York University · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Sub 9 at AECMU54GM075026 · NIGMS · NEW YORK STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY CENTER · PI INOUYE, MASAYORI · 2005 to 2009
$16.8M
Structural mechanics of MsbA family ABC transportersR01GM072867 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HUNT, JOHN FRANCIS · 2005 to 2009
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM072867NIGMS NIH HHS 1R21GM07595933NIGMS NIH HHS 1U54GM75026NIGMS NIH HHS 5U54GM075026NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072867NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM075026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overexpression represents a principal bottleneck in structural and functional studies of integral membrane proteins (IMPs). Although E. coli remains the leading organism for convenient and economical protein overexpression, many IMPs exhibit toxicity on induction in this host and give low yields of properly folded protein. Different mechanisms related to membrane biogenesis and IMP folding have been proposed to contribute to these problems, but there is limited understanding of the physical and physiological constraints on IMP overexpression and folding in vivo. Therefore, we used a variety of genetic, genomic, and microscopy techniques to characterize the physiological responses of Escherichia coli MG1655 cells to overexpression of a set of soluble proteins and IMPs, including constructs exhibiting different levels of toxicity and producing different levels of properly folded versus misfolded product on induction. Genetic marker studies coupled with transcriptomic results indicate only minor perturbations in many of the physiological systems implicated in previous studies of IMP biogenesis. Overexpression of either IMPs or soluble proteins tends to block execution of the standard stationary-phase transcriptional program, although these effects are consistently stronger for the IMPs included in our study. However, these perturbations are not an impediment to successful protein overexpression. We present evidence that, at least for the target proteins included in our study, there is no inherent obstacle to IMP overexpression in E. coli at moderate levels suitable for structural studies and that the biochemical and conformational properties of the proteins themselves are the major obstacles to success. Toxicity associated with target protein activity produces selective pressure leading to preferential growth of cells harboring expression-reducing and inactivating mutations, which can produce chemical heterogeneity in the target protein population, potentially contributing to the difficulties encountered in IMP crystallization.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenetic VectorsMembrane ProteinsProtein Array AnalysisProtein FoldingRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsRNA, MessengerTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21719796
PMCPMC3205863
OpenAlexW2149188963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.