Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21717458›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2012

Health and economic impact of HPV 16/18 vaccination and cervical cancer screening in Eastern Africa.

Nicole G Campos, Jane J Kim, Philip E Castle, Jesse D Ortendahl, Meredith O'Shea, Mireia Diaz, Sue J Goldie

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole G CamposCenter for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. gastin@post.harvard.edu
Jane J Kim
Philip E Castle
Jesse D Ortendahl
Meredith O'Shea
Mireia Diaz
Sue J Goldie
Decision Sciences (United States) · USAmerican Society for Clinical Pathology · USHarvard University · USInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

Clinical & Cost Effectiveness of HPV Vaccination in the USR01CA093435 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI GOLDIE, SUE J · 2002 to 2009
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA93435NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eastern Africa has the world's highest cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates. We used epidemiologic data from Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe to develop models of HPV-related infection and disease. For each country, we assessed HPV vaccination of girls before age 12 followed by screening with HPV DNA testing once, twice, or three times per lifetime (at ages 35, 40, 45). For women over age 30, we assessed only screening (with HPV DNA testing up to three times per lifetime or VIA at age 35). Assuming no waning immunity, mean reduction in lifetime cancer risk associated with vaccination ranged from 36 to 45%, and vaccination followed by screening once per lifetime at age 35 with HPV DNA testing ranged from 43 to 51%. For both younger and older women, the most effective screening strategy was HPV DNA testing three times per lifetime. Provided the cost per vaccinated girl was less than I$10 (I$2 per dose), vaccination had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [I$ (international dollars)/year of life saved (YLS)] less than the country-specific per capita GDP, a commonly cited heuristic for "very cost-effective" interventions. If the cost per vaccinated girl was between I$10 (I$2 per dose) and I$25 (I$5 per dose), vaccination followed by HPV DNA testing would save the most lives and would be considered good value for public health dollars. These results should be used to catalyze design and evaluation of HPV vaccine delivery and screening programs, and contribute to a dialogue on financing HPV vaccination in poor countries.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfrica, EasternChildCost-Benefit AnalysisDNA, ViralFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansMiddle AgedPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationDNA, ViralPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID21717458
PMCPMC3314721
OpenAlexW2080520717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.