Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21717092›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2012

Gastric linitis plastica: which role for surgical resection?

Corrado Pedrazzani, Daniele Marrelli, Fabio Pacelli, Maria Di Cosmo, Gianni Mura, Francesca Bettarini, Fausto Rosa, Giovanni de Manzoni, Franco Roviello

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gastrectomy with or without neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin for type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer (JCOG0501): an open-label, phase 3, randomized controlled trial.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Comprehensive transcriptomic profiling and mutational landscape of primary gastric linitis plastica.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Letter to editor: development and internal validation of a diagnostic score for gastric linitis plastic.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development and internal validation of a diagnostic score for gastric linitis plastica.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2020
    Article
  16. Linitis Plastica: a Distinct Type of Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  17. Borrmann Type IV Gastric Cancer: Focus on the Role of Gastrectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Corrado PedrazzaniUnit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Human Pathology and Oncology, Istituto Toscano Tumouri, University of Siena and ITT, Siena, Italy. pedrazzani@unisi.it
Daniele Marrelli
Fabio Pacelli
Maria Di Cosmo
Gianni Mura
Francesca Bettarini
Fausto Rosa
Giovanni de Manzoni
Franco Roviello
University of Siena · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of surgery for gastric linitis plastica (GLP) is questioned. This study aimed to analyze our experience in the surgical treatment of GLP with specific reference to the resectability rate, prognosis, and mode of recurrence.

methodsResults of surgery were analyzed in 102 patients with GLP.

resultsOf the 102 patients, 92 underwent surgical exploration, with resection performed in 60 cases. R2 resection was carried out in 20 patients and R1 in 12 patients, while the resection was considered potentially curative (R0) in 28 (27.5%). Overall, the median (95% confidence interval [CI]) survival time was 5.7 (3.7-7.5) months, with none of the patients alive at the end date of the study. For R0 patients the median (95% CI) survival time was 15.8 (11-20.7) months. The great majority of recurrences were intra-abdominal (peritoneal and/or locoregional), with a systemic component of the relapse that was rarely observed (5 cases).

conclusionsAfter primary surgery, GLP showed a poor prognosis without regard to the extent or type of resection. The failure of surgical treatment related mainly to the peritoneal spread of the disease. Specifically designed multimodality treatment protocols should be tested in this setting.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLinitis PlasticaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisStomach NeoplasmsSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21717092
OpenAlexW2066440424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.