Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21716843›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosciences in rural practice2011

Objective assessment of utility of intraoperative ultrasound in resection of central nervous system tumors: A cost-effective tool for intraoperative navigation in neurosurgery.

Aliasgar Moiyadi, Prakash Shetty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosciences in rural practice, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ultrasound guided microsurgical resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Choice of intraoperative ultrasound adjuncts for brain tumor surgery.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Intraoperative Imaging for High-Grade Glioma Surgery.Neurosurgery clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Intraoperative ultrasound in pediatric brain tumors: does the surgeon get it right?Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aliasgar MoiyadiNeurosurgery Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, India.
Prakash Shetty
Tata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocalization and delineation of extent of lesions is critical for safe maximal resection of brain and spinal cord tumors. Frame-based and frameless stereotaxy and intraoperative MRI are costly and not freely available especially in economically constrained nations. Intraoperative ultrasound has been around for a while but has been relegated to the background. Lack of objective evidence for its usefulness and the perceived "user unfriendliness" of US are probably responsible for this. We recount our experience with this "forgotten" tool and propose an objective assessment score of its utility in an attempt to revive this practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy seven intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) studies were carried out in patients with brain and spinal cord tumors. Seven parameters were identified to measure the "utility" of the IOUS and a "utility score" was devised (minimum 0 and maximum 7). Individual parameter and overall scores were calculated for each case.

resultsIOUS was found to be useful in many ways. The median overall score was 6 (mean score 5.65). There were no scores less than 4 with the majority demonstrating usefulness in 5 or more parameters (91%). The use of the IOUS significantly influenced the performance of the surgery in these cases without significantly prolonging surgery.

conclusionsThe IOUS is a very useful tool in intraoperative localization and delineation of lesions and planning various stages of tumor resection. It is easy, convenient, reliable, widely available, and above all a cost-effective tool. It should be increasingly used by neurosurgeons in the developing world where costlier intraoperative localization and imaging is not available freely.

Indexed as

Cost-effectiveintraoperative imagingintraoperative ultrasoundscoring systemutility

Identifiers

PMID21716843
PMCPMC3123010
OpenAlexW2143893448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.