Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21716673›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedicine & biotechnology2011

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling: methodology, applications, and limitations with a focus on its role in pediatric drug development.

Feras Khalil, Stephanie Läer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Re-Thinking Pharmacokinetics in Ovarian Cancer: What Do Organoids Add?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. State of Art of Dose Individualization to Support tacrolimus drug monitoring: What's Next?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  13. MechanisticComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Feras KhalilDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy, Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Stephanie Läer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was introduced years ago, but it has not been practiced significantly. However, interest in and implementation of this modeling technique have grown, as evidenced by the increased number of publications in this field. This paper demonstrates briefly the methodology, applications, and limitations of PBPK modeling with special attention given to discuss the use of PBPK models in pediatric drug development and some examples described in detail. Although PBPK models do have some limitations, the potential benefit from PBPK modeling technique is huge. PBPK models can be applied to investigate drug pharmacokinetics under different physiological and pathological conditions or in different age groups, to support decision-making during drug discovery, to provide, perhaps most important, data that can save time and resources, especially in early drug development phases and in pediatric clinical trials, and potentially to help clinical trials become more "confirmatory" rather than "exploratory".

Indexed as

Drug DesignModels, BiologicalPharmacokineticsChildClinical Trials as TopicHumansRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID21716673
PMCPMC3118302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.