Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21716591›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of internal medicine2011

Retrospective comparison of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin on multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes.

Jinwoo Lee, Chang-Hoon Lee, Deog Kyeom Kim, Ho Il Yoon, Jae Yeol Kim, Sang-Min Lee, Seok-Chul Yang, Jae Ho Lee, Chul-Gyu Yoo, Choon-Taek Lee and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis (presumed drug-sensitive).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Specific gyrA gene mutations predict poor treatment outcome in MDR-TB.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jinwoo LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Lung Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chang-Hoon Lee
Deog Kyeom Kim
Ho Il Yoon
Jae Yeol Kim
Sang-Min Lee
Seok-Chul Yang
Jae Ho Lee
Chul-Gyu Yoo
Choon-Taek Lee
Hee Soon Chung
Young Whan Kim
Sung Koo Han
Jae-Joon Yim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsTo compare the effect of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin on treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB).

methodsA retrospective analysis of 171 patients with MDR-TB receiving either levofloxacin or moxifloxacin was performed. Treatment responses were categorized into treatment success (cured and treatment completed) or adverse treatment outcome (death, failure, and relapsed).

resultsThe median age of the patients was 42.0 years. Approximately 56% of the patients were male. Seventeen patients had extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, and 20 had a surgical resection. A total of 123 patients (71.9%) received levofloxacin for a median 594 days, and 48 patients (28.1%) received moxifloxacin for a median 673 days. Other baseline demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. The moxifloxacin group had a significantly higher number of resistant drugs (p < 0.001) and a higher incidence of resistance to ofloxacin (p = 0.005) in the drug sensitivity test. The treatment success rate was 78.9% in the levofloxacin group and 83.3% in the moxifloxacin group (p = 0.42). Adverse reactions occurred at similar rates in the groups (p = 0.44). Patients in the moxifloxacin group were not more likely to have treatment success than those in the levofloxacin group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 2.43; p = 0.65).

conclusionsBoth levofloxacin and moxifloxacin showed equivalent efficacy for treating MDR-TB.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialLevofloxacinAdultAntitubercular AgentsAza CompoundsCase-Control StudiesChi-Square DistributionDrug Therapy, CombinationExtensively Drug-Resistant TuberculosisFemaleFluoroquinolonesHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMoxifloxacinAntitubercular AgentsAza CompoundsFluoroquinolonesLevofloxacinMoxifloxacinOfloxacinQuinolinesLevofloxacinMoxifloxacinQuinolonesTuberculosisTuberculosis, multidrug-resistant

Identifiers

PMID21716591
PMCPMC3110847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.