Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21716079›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2011

Assessment of copy number status of chromosomes 6 and 11 by FISH provides independent prognostic information in primary melanoma.

Jeffrey P North, John T Vetto, Rajmohan Murali, Kevin P White, Clifton R White, Boris C Bastian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in melanoma.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Histological and genetic evidence for a variant of superficial spreading melanoma composed predominantly of large nests.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey P NorthDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
John T Vetto
Rajmohan Murali
Kevin P White
Clifton R White
Boris C Bastian
University of California, San Francisco · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Biomarker Discovery for the Classification of MelanomaR01CA131524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASTIAN, BORIS C. · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131524NCI NIH HHS R01CA1315241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma incidence has been rising steadily for decades, whereas mortality rates have remained flat. This type of discordant pattern between incidence and mortality has been linked to diagnostic drift in cancers of the thyroid, breast, and prostate. Ancillary tests, such as fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), are now being used to help differentiate melanomas from melanocytic nevi. Multicolor FISH has been shown to distinguish between these 2 with 86.7% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity. To assess the ability of FISH to differentiate melanomas with metastatic or lethal potential from those with an indolent disease course, we performed FISH with probes targeting 6p25, centromere 6, 6q23, and 11q13 on 144 primary melanomas with a minimal tumor thickness of 2 mm and compared the development of metastatic disease and melanoma-specific mortality as well as relapse-free and disease-specific survival between FISH-positive and FISH-negative cases. Of the melanomas, 82% were positive by FISH according to previously defined criteria. The percentage was significantly higher (93%) in cases that developed systemic metastases (n=43) than in patients that did not (77%, n=101). FISH-positive primaries had a significantly increased risk of metastasis or melanoma-related death compared with FISH-negative cases odds ratio 4.11; confidence interval, 1.14-22.7 and odds ratio 7.0, confidence interval 1.03-300.4, respectively. FISH status remained an independent parameter when controlling for known prognostic factors. These data indicate that the group of melanomas diagnosed with routine histopathology that lack aberrations detected by FISH is enriched for melanomas with a more indolent disease course. This suggests that molecular techniques can assist in a more accurate identification of tumors with metastatic potential.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6In Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGenotypeHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanomaMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID21716079
PMCPMC4153784
OpenAlexW2065465102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.