Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21715571›Full record

SynthesisPostgraduate medical journal2011

Patterns of 'leakage' in the utilisation of clinical guidelines: a systematic review.

Sharon Mickan, Amanda Burls, Paul Glasziou

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Postgraduate medical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 92 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05466656 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project: Assessment of Implementation of Best Practices in a National Health System (Second Edition)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTeresa Moreno CasbasRan2021 to 2024Enrolled115ConditionsPain, Incontinence, Urinary, Obesity, Childhood, BreastfeedingArmsContinuous quality improvement cycle model
NCT06522529 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project: Assessment of Implementation of Best Practices in a National Health System (Thrid Edition)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIRan2024 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsPain, Obesity, Childhood, Breast Feeding, Incontinence, UrinaryArmsMultifaceted implementation strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Facilitators of Clinical Guideline Implementation in Tertiary Care: A Systematic Literature Review.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sharon MickanDepartment of Primary Health Care, International Program in Evidence Based Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. sharon.mickan@phc.ox.ac.uk
Amanda Burls
Paul Glasziou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch evidence is insufficient to change physicians' behaviour. In 1996, Pathman developed a four step model: that physicians need to be aware of, agree with, adopt, and adhere to guidelines.

objectiveTo review evidence in different settings on the patterns of 'leakage' in the utilisation of clinical guidelines using Pathman's awareness-to-adherence model.

methodsA systematic review was conducted in June 2010. Primary studies were included if they reported on rates of awareness and agreement and adoption and/or adherence.

results11 primary studies were identified, reporting on 29 recommendations. Descriptive analyses of patterns and causes of leakage were tabulated and graphed. Leakage was progressive across all four steps. Median adherence from all recommendations was 34%, suggesting that potential benefits for patients from health research may be lost. There was considerable variation across different types of guidelines. Recommendations for drug interventions, vaccination and health promotion activities showed high rates of awareness. Leakage was most pronounced between adoption and adherence for drug recommendations and between awareness and agreement for medical management recommendations. Barriers were reported differentially for all steps of the model.

conclusionLeakage from research publication to guideline utilisation occurs in a wide variety of clinical settings and at all steps of the awareness-to-adherence pathway. This review confirms that clinical guidelines are insufficient to implement research and suggests there may be different factors influencing clinicians at each step of this pathway. Recommendations to improve guideline adherence need to be tailored to each step.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeGuideline AdherenceHumansPhysiciansPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID21715571
PMCPMC3181428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.