Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21715517›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2011

Benefits of Renin-Angiotensin blockade on retinopathy in type 1 diabetes vary with glycemic control.

Tasma Harindhanavudhi, Michael Mauer, Ronald Klein, Bernard Zinman, Alan Sinaiko, M Luiza Caramori, Renin Angiotensin System Study (RASS) group

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Diabetic Microvascular Disease: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Many Faces of Renin-angiotensin System - Focus on Eye.The open ophthalmology journal · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tasma HarindhanavudhiDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. hari0049@umn.edu
Michael Mauer
Ronald Klein
Bernard Zinman
Alan Sinaiko
M Luiza Caramori
Renin Angiotensin System Study (RASS) group

Funding

YOUTH DRUG ABUSE, ADHD, AND RELATED DISRUPTIVE DISORDERSM01RR000400 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SMITH, ANGELA L · 1985 to 2009
$33.7M
Renin Angiotensin System Blockage-DN (RASS)R01DK051975 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MAUER, S MICHAEL · 1997 to 2007
$7.0M
CIHR DCT 14281NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000400NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR-00400NIDDK NIH HHS DK-51975NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK051975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOptimal glycemic control slows diabetic retinopathy (DR) development and progression and is the standard of care for type 1 diabetes. However, these glycemic goals are difficult to achieve and sustain in clinical practice. The Renin Angiotensin System Study (RASS) showed that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade can slow DR progression. In the current study, we evaluate whether glycemic control influenced the benefit of RAS blockade on DR progression in type 1 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe used RASS data to analyze the relationships between two-steps or more DR progression and baseline glycemic levels in 223 normotensive, normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients randomized to receive 5 years of enalapril or losartan compared with placebo.

resultsA total of 147 of 223 patients (65.9%) had DR at baseline (47 of 74 patients [63.5%] in placebo and 100 of 149 patients [67.1%] in the combined treatment groups [P = 0.67]). Patients with two-steps or more DR progression had higher baseline A1C than those without progression (9.4 vs. 8.2%, P < 0.001). There was no beneficial effect of RAS blockade (P = 0.92) in patients with baseline A1C ≤7.5%. In contrast, 30 of 112 (27%) patients on the active treatment arms with A1C >7.5% had two-steps or more DR progression compared with 26 of 56 patients (46%) in the placebo group (P = 0.03).

conclusionsRAS blockade reduces DR progression in normotensive, normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients with A1C >7.5%. Whether this therapy could benefit patients with A1C ≤7.5% will require long-term studies of much larger cohorts.

Indexed as

AdultAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic RetinopathyEnalaprilFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansLosartanMaleRenin-Angiotensin SystemYoung AdultAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBlood GlucoseEnalaprilGlycated HemoglobinLosartan

Identifiers

PMID21715517
PMCPMC3142059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.