ReviewBiology direct2011
How stands the Tree of Life a century and a half after The Origin?
Review in Biology direct, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why did some viruses evolve to be giants while others did not?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Challenges in Assembling the Dated Tree of Life.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- The Notable Achievements and the Prospects of Bacterial Pathogen Genomics.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Cancer's second genome: Microbial cancer diagnostics and redefining clonal evolution as a multispecies process: Humans and their tumors are not aseptic, and the multispecies nature of cancer modulates clinical care and clonal evolution: Humans and their tumors are not aseptic, and the multispecies nature of cancer modulates clinical care and clonal evolution.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Evolution of Microbial Genomics: Conceptual Shifts over a Quarter Century.Trends in microbiology · 2021Review
- A New Analysis of Archaea-Bacteria Domain Separation: Variable Phylogenetic Distance and the Tempo of Early Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Phylogenomics of 10,575 genomes reveals evolutionary proximity between domains Bacteria and Archaea.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Genome and pan-genome analysis to classify emerging bacteria.Biology direct · 2019Review
- Consensus statement: Virus taxonomy in the age of metagenomics.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2017Article
- Robust Inference of Genetic Exchange Communities from Microbial Genomes Using TF-IDF.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Inference of Ancestral Recombination Graphs through Topological Data Analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- The Astrobiology Primer v2.0.Astrobiology · 2016Review
- Horizontal gene transfer: essentiality and evolvability in prokaryotes, and roles in evolutionary transitions.F1000Research · 2016Review
- Archaeal ancestors of eukaryotes: not so elusive any more.BMC biology · 2015Article
- Pan-genomic analysis to redefine species and subspecies based on quantum discontinuous variation: the Klebsiella paradigm.Biology direct · 2015Article
- Evolutionary change and phylogenetic relationships in light of horizontal gene transfer.Journal of biosciences · 2015Review
- The Turbulent Network Dynamics of Microbial Evolution and the Statistical Tree of Life.Journal of molecular evolution · 2015Review
- Article
- The origins of cellular life.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2014Review
- Carl Woese's vision of cellular evolution and the domains of life.RNA biology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examine the Tree of Life (TOL) as an evolutionary hypothesis and a heuristic. The original TOL hypothesis has failed but a new "statistical TOL hypothesis" is promising. The TOL heuristic usefully organizes data without positing fundamental evolutionary truth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.