Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21714807›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2012

Physicians' reported needs of drug information at point of care in Sweden.

Pia Bastholm Rahmner, Birgit Eiermann, Seher Korkmaz, Lars L Gustafsson, Magnus Gruvén, Simon Maxwell, Hans-Georg Eichle, Anikó Vég

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Medicines postpartum in Sweden and coverage in Janusmed Breastfeeding.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Polypharmacy: a healthcare conundrum with a pharmacogenetic solution.Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pia Bastholm RahmnerCentre of Medical Knowledge, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden. pia.bastholm-rahmner@sll.se
Birgit Eiermann
Seher Korkmaz
Lars L Gustafsson
Magnus Gruvén
Simon Maxwell
Hans-Georg Eichle
Anikó Vég

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsRelevant and easily accessible drug information at point-of-care is essential for physicians' decision making when prescribing. However, the information available by using Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) often does not meet physicians' requirements. The Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) is statutory information about drugs. However, the current structure, content and format of SmPCs make it difficult to incorporate them into CDSSs and link them to relevant patient information from the Electronic Health Records. The aim of the study was to evaluate the perceived needs for drug information among physicians in Sweden.

methodsWe recruited three focus group discussions with 18 physicians covering different specialities. The information from the groups was combined with a questionnaire administered at the beginning of the group discussions.

resultsPhysicians reported their needs for knowledge databases at the point of drug prescribing. This included more consistent information about existing and new drugs. They also wished to receive automatically generated alerts for severe drug-drug interactions and adverse effects, and to have functions for calculating glomerular filtration rate to enable appropriate dose adjustments to be made for elderly patients and those with impaired renal function. Additionally, features enhancing electronic communication with colleagues and making drug information more searchable were suggested.

conclusionsThe results from the current study showed the need for knowledge databases which provide consistent information about new and existing drugs. Most of the required information from physicians appeared to be possible to transfer from current SmPCs to CDSSs. However, inconsistencies in the SmPC information have to be reduced to enhance their utility.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsAdultDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDrug Information ServicesFocus GroupsHumansMaleMedical InformaticsMiddle AgedPhysiciansPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesSweden

Identifiers

PMID21714807
PMCPMC3248261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.