ArticleJournal of medicinal chemistry2011
Probing the steric space at the floor of the D1 dopamine receptor orthosteric binding domain: 7α-, 7β-, 8α-, and 8β-methyl substituted dihydrexidine analogues.
Article in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional roles of T3.37 and S5.46 in the activation mechanism of the dopamine D1 receptor.Journal of molecular modeling · 2017Article
- Intermolecular oxidative decarbonylative [2 + 2 + 2] carbocyclization ofChemical science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To probe the space at the floor of the orthosteric ligand binding site in the dopamine D(1) receptor, four methylated analogues of dihydrexidine (DHX) were synthesized with substitutions at the 7 and 8 positions. The 8α-axial, 8β-equatorial, and 7α-equatorial were synthesized by photochemical cyclization of appropriately substituted N-benzoyl enamines, and the 7β-axial analogue was prepared by an intramolecular Henry reaction. All of the methylated analogues displayed losses in affinity when compared to DHX (20 nM): 8β-Me(ax)-DHX (270 nM), 8α-Me(eq)-DHX (920 nM), 7β-Me(eq)-DHX (6540 nM), and 7α-Me(ax)-DHX (>10000 nM). Molecular modeling studies suggest that although the disruption of an aromatic interaction between Phe203(5.47) and Phe288(6.51) is the cause for the 14-fold loss in affinity associated with 8β-axial substitution, unfavorable steric interactions with Ser107(3.36) result in the more dramatic decreases in binding affinity suffered by the rest of the analogues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.