Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21713611›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2011

[New agents for the therapy of angina pectoris].

T Meinertz, R Köster

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T MeinertzKlinik für Allgemeine und Interventionelle Kardiologie, Universitäres Herzzentrum, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg. meinertz@uke.de
R Köster
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DEUniversitäres Kinderwunschzentrum Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a renaissance of medical treatment of chronic angina pectoris despite of advances in interventional therapy. New drugs include nicorandil, ivabradine and ranolazine. Nicorandil dilates venous and arterial vessels via relaxation of smooth muscle cells. Since the drug has only recently been approved, the German experience is limited. Ivabradine exerts an anti-anginous effect by selective action on the sinus node with reduction of heart rate. Multiple studies have demonstrated its anti-anginal efficacy, which has also been shown if it was used as an additional therapy to classic anti-anginal treatment. Its use is reasonable as a substitute for beta-blockers or as an "add-on therapy" combined with beta-blockers, if the target heart rate for treatment of angina pectoris has not been reached. Ranolazine delays the late sodium current into the myocytes. Thereby, it improves the diastolic ventricular function and the microcirculation of the myocardium. Several large studies confirmed the anti-anginal efficacy of the drug. Currently it is used if angina pectoris still occurs under a combined treatment with different classic anti-anginal drugs.

Indexed as

AcetanilidesAngina PectorisBenzazepinesCoronary Artery DiseaseCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsDouble-Blind MethodDrug ApprovalEnzyme InhibitorsHumansIvabradineNicorandilPiperazinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRanolazineVasodilator AgentsAcetanilidesBenzazepinesCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsEnzyme InhibitorsIvabradineNicorandilPiperazinesRanolazineVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID21713611
OpenAlexW16643742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.