ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2011
Comparative permeabilities of the paracellular and transcellular pathways of corneal endothelial layers.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Epithelial response to vocal fold microflap injury in a preclinical model.The Laryngoscope · 2023Article
- Delivery of Therapeutic Agents to the Central Nervous System and the Promise of Extracellular Vesicles.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Structural dynamics of tight junctions modulate the properties of the epithelial barrier.PloS one · 2019Article
- The second sodium pump: from the function to the gene.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Layers of rabbit corneal endothelial cells were cultured on permeable inserts. We characterized the diffusional permeability of the cell layer to nonelectrolyte and charged molecules and compared the diffusional and filtration permeabilities of the paracellular and transcellular pathways. We determined the rates of diffusion of (3)H- and (14)C-labeled nonelectrolyte test molecules and estimated the equivalent pore radius of the tight junction. Negatively charged molecules permeate slower than neutral molecules, while positively charged molecules permeate faster. Palmitoyl-DL-carnitine, which opens tight junctions, caused an increase of permeability and equivalent pore radius. Diffusional water permeability was determined with (3)H-labeled water; the permeabilities of the tight junction and lateral intercellular space were calculated using tissue geometry and the Renkin equation. The diffusional permeability (P(d)) of the paracellular pathway to water is 0.57 μm s(-1) and that of the transcellular path is 2.52 μm s(-1). From the P(d) data we calculated the filtration permeabilities (P(f)) for the paracellular and transcellular pathways as 41.3 and 30.2 μm s(-1), respectively. In conclusion, the movement of hydrophilic molecules through tight junctions corresponds to diffusion through negatively charged pores (r = 2.1 ± 0.35 nm). The paracellular water permeability represents 58% of the filtration permeability of the layer, which points to that route as the site of sizable water transport. In addition, we calculated for NaCl a reflection coefficient of 0.16 ≤ σ(NaCl) ≤ 0.33, which militates against osmosis through the junctions and, hence, indirectly supports the electro-osmosis hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.