Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21713381›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2011

Quantification of cAMP and cGMP analogs in intact cells: pitfalls in enzyme immunoassays for cyclic nucleotides.

Katharina Werner, Frank Schwede, Hans-Gottfried Genieser, Jörg Geiger, Elke Butt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tissues cIMPly do not lie.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. cGMP becomes a drug target.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina WernerInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, University of Wuerzburg, Grombuehlstrasse 12, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Frank Schwede
Hans-Gottfried Genieser
Jörg Geiger
Elke Butt
University of Würzburg · DEBiolog Life Science Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunoassays are routinely used as research tools to measure intracellular cAMP and cGMP concentrations. Ideally, this application requires antibodies with high sensitivity and specificity. The present work evaluates the cross-reactivity of commercially available cyclic nucleotide analogs with two non-radioactive and one radioactive cAMP and cGMP immunoassay. Most of the tested cyclic nucleotide analogs showed low degree competition with the antibodies; however, with Rp-cAMPS, 8-Br-cGMP and 8-pCPT-cGMP, a strong cross-reactivity with the corresponding cAMP and cGMP, respectively, immunoassays was observed. The determined EIA-binding constants enabled the measurement of the intracellular cyclic nucleotide concentrations and revealed a time- and lipophilicity-dependent cell membrane permeability of the compounds in the range of 10-30% of the extracellular applied concentration, thus allowing a more accurate prediction of the intracellular analog levels in a given experiment.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding, CompetitiveBlood PlateletsBlotting, WesternCell Membrane PermeabilityCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusCross ReactionsCyclic AMPCyclic GMPElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesRadioimmunoassayCyclic AMPCyclic GMP

Identifiers

PMID21713381
PMCPMC3145891
OpenAlexW2158112639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.