Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21712846›Full record

ArticleHeredity2011

Bayesian shrinkage analysis of QTLs under shape-adaptive shrinkage priors, and accurate re-estimation of genetic effects.

C M Mutshinda, M J Sillanpää

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Swift block-updating EM and pseudo-EM procedures for Bayesian shrinkage analysis of quantitative trait loci.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C M MutshindaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. crispin.mutshindamwanza@helsinki.fi
M J Sillanpää
Statistics Finland · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The successful implementation of Bayesian shrinkage analysis of high-dimensional regression models, as often encountered in quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping, is contingent upon the choice of suitable sparsity-inducing priors. In practice, the shape (that is, the rate of tail decay) of such priors is typically preset, with no regard for the range of plausible alternatives and the fact that the most appropriate shape may depend on the data at hand. This study is presumably the first attempt to tackle this oversight through the shape-adaptive shrinkage prior (SASP) approach, with a focus on the mapping of QTLs in experimental crosses. Simulation results showed that the separation between genuine QTL effects and spurious ones can be made clearer using the SASP-based approach as compared with existing competitors. This feature makes our new method a promising approach to QTL mapping, where good separation is the ultimate goal. We also discuss a re-estimation procedure intended to improve the accuracy of the estimated genetic effects of detected QTLs with regard to shrinkage-induced bias, which may be particularly important in large-scale models with collinear predictors. The re-estimation procedure is relevant to any shrinkage method, and is potentially valuable for many scientific disciplines such as bioinformatics and quantitative genetics, where oversaturated models are booming.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociAlgorithmsChromosome MappingComputer SimulationGene FrequencyGenotypeHordeumPhenotypeRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID21712846
PMCPMC3199931
OpenAlexW2008738057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.