ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2011
Obstructed metabolite diffusion within skeletal muscle cells in silico.
Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using a Monte Carlo simulation technique, we have modeled 3D diffusion of low molecular weight metabolites inside a skeletal muscle cell. The following structural elements are considered: (i) a regular lattice of actin and myosin filaments inside a myofibril, (ii) the membranes of sarcoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria surrounding the myofibrils, (iii) a set of myofibrils inside a skeletal muscle cell encircled by the outer cell membrane, and (iv) an additional set of regular intracellular structures ("macrocompartments") embedded into the cell interior. The macrocompartments are considered to simulate diffusion restrictions because of hypothetical cylindrical structures (16-22 μm in diameter) suggested earlier (de Graaf et al. Biophys J 78: 1657-1664, 2000). This model allowed us to calculate the apparent coefficients of particle diffusion in the radial and axial directions, D(app)(⊥) and D(app)(II), respectively. Particle movements in the axial direction are considered, at first approximation, as unrestricted diffusion (D(app)(II) = const). The apparent coefficient of radial diffusion, D(app)(⊥), decreases with time because of particle collisions with myofilaments and other rigid obstacles. Results of our random walk simulations are in fairly good agreement with experimental data on NMR measurements of restricted radial diffusion of phosphocreatine in white and red skeletal muscles of goldfish (Kinsey et al. NMR Biomed 12:1-7, 1999). Particle reflections from the low-permeable borders of macrocompartments (efficient diameter, D(eff)(MC) ≈ 9.2-10.4 μm) are the prerequisite for agreeing theoretical and experimental data. The low-permeable coverage of hypothetical macrocompartments (99.8% of coverage) provides the main contribution to time-dependent decrease in D(app)(⊥).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.