Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21710266›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2011

Accuracy of hydro-multidetector row CT in the local T staging of oesophageal cancer compared to postoperative histopathological results.

Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah, Wolfgang Matzek, Susanne Baroud, Nina Bastati, Johannes Zacherl, Sebastian F Schoppmann, Michael Hejna, Fritz Wrba, Michael Weber, Christian J Herold and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Enteral contrast media-when, what, and how?]Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. [Enteral contrast agents-When, what and how?]Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Role of precision imaging in esophageal cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ahmed Ba-SsalamahDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. ahmed.ba-ssalamah@meduniwien.ac.at
Wolfgang Matzek
Susanne Baroud
Nina Bastati
Johannes Zacherl
Sebastian F Schoppmann
Michael Hejna
Fritz Wrba
Michael Weber
Christian J Herold
Richard M Gore

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography with water filling (Hydro-MDCT) in the T-staging of patients with oesophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsThere were 131 consecutive patients who were preoperatively and prospectively examined in the prone position on arterial phase contrast-enhanced MDCT, after ingestion of 1,000-1,500 ml tap water and effervescent granules. Two readers staged the local tumour growth (T-staging) independently. They assessed tumour location, size, presence of stenosis, and morphology of the outer border of the oesophageal wall and perioesophageal fat planes on CT. CT findings were compared with histopathological results from resected specimens. Data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical package.

resultsBoth readers obtained a high sensitivity of 95% and a high positive predictive value of 96%. Accurate local staging was achieved in 76.3% and 68.7% for readers 1 and 2, respectively. Inter-reader agreement was excellent (weighted κ value of 0.93 and un-weighted κ of 0.89).

conclusionUsing the hydro-technique and applying specific assessment criteria, MDCT appears to be an accurate, non-invasive diagnostic tool for local tumour staging of oesophageal cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHistological TechniquesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingObserver VariationPostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.