Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21708874›Full record

ArticleVascular medicine (London, England)2011

The association of arterial shear and flow-mediated dilation in diabetes.

Bethany Barone Gibbs, Devon A Dobrosielski, Michael Lima, Susanne Bonekamp, Kerry J Stewart, Jeanne M Clark

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vascular medicine (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03593746 (Effects of High Intensity Interval Training and Combined Training Associated With Photobiomodulation in Type 2 Diabetic), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03593746 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effects of High Intensity Interval Training and Combined Training Associated With Photobiomodulation in Type 2 Diabetic (T2D) Patients: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Nove de JulhoRan2020 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, High-Intensity Interval Training, Exercise Training, Hyperglycaemia Due to Type 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsPhysical training, Light-Emitting Diode (LED) therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bethany Barone GibbsDepartment of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. bbarone@pitt.edu
Devon A Dobrosielski
Michael Lima
Susanne Bonekamp
Kerry J Stewart
Jeanne M Clark
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Exercise training in type 2 diabetes and hypertensionR01DK062368 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STEWART, KERRY J. · 2004 to 2008
$2.5M
Cardiovascular and hepatic effects of exercise in hypertensive adultsR21HL095157 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, JEANNE M · 2009 to 2010
$451k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL095157NHLBI NIH HHS R21-HL095157NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062368NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062368-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While adjusting flow-mediated dilation (FMD), a measure of vascular function, for shear rate may be important when evaluating endothelial-dependent vasodilation, the relationship of FMD with shear rate in study populations with cardiovascular risk factors is unclear. We aimed to investigate the association of four measures of shear rate (peak shear rate (SR(peak)) and shear rate area under the curve through 30 seconds (SR(AUC 0-30)), 60 seconds (SR(AUC 0-60)), and time to peak dilation (SR(AUC 0-ttp))) with FMD in 50 study subjects with type 2 diabetes and mild hypertension undergoing baseline FMD testing for an exercise intervention trial. Associations among measures of shear rate and FMD were evaluated using Pearson's correlations and R(2). The four measures of shear rate were highly correlated within subjects, with Pearson's correlations ranging from 0.783 (p < 0.001) to 0.972 (p < 0.001). FMD was associated with each measure of shear rate, having a correlation of 0.576 (p < 0.001) with SR(AUC 0-30), 0.529 (p < 0.001) with SR(AUC 0-60), and 0.512 (p < 0.001) with SR(peak). Nine of 50 subjects (18%) did not dilate following the shear stimulus. Among the 41 responders, FMD had a correlation of 0.517 (p < 0.001) with SR(AUC 0-ttp) and similar correlations to those found in the full sample for SR(AUC 0-30), SR(AUC 0-60), and SR(peak). In conclusion, shear rate appears to explain up to a third of between-person variability in FMD response and our results support the reporting of shear rate and FMD with and without adjustment for shear rate in similar clinical populations with CVD risk factors.

Indexed as

VasodilationAdultBaltimoreBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureBrachial ArteryCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedRegional Blood FlowStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID21708874
PMCPMC4397901
OpenAlexW2097315278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.