Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21708287›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2011

Performance and clinical evaluation of the 92-gene real-time PCR assay for tumor classification.

Mark G Erlander, Xiao-Jun Ma, Nicole C Kesty, Lei Bao, Ranelle Salunga, Catherine A Schnabel

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. SEOM-GECOD clinical guideline for cancer of unknown primary (update 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  2. SEOM-GECOD clinical guideline for unknown primary cancer (2021).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Guideline
  3. SEOM-GETTHI clinical guideline for the practical management of molecular platforms (2021).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. SEOM clinical guideline on unknown primary cancer (2017).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark G ErlanderbioTheranostics, Inc., San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Xiao-Jun Ma
Nicole C Kesty
Lei Bao
Ranelle Salunga
Catherine A Schnabel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate determination of cancer origin is necessary to guide optimal treatment but remains a diagnostic challenge. Gene expression profiling technologies have aided the classification of tumors and, therefore, could be applied in conjunction with clinicopathologic correlates to improve accuracy. We report an expanded version of the previously described 92-gene assay to classify 30 main tumor types and 54 histological subtypes, with coverage of ≥95% of all solid tumors based on incidence. Increased tissue coverage was achieved through expansion of a reference tumor database containing 2,206 specimens, with a median of 62 samples per main tumor type. The 92-gene classification algorithm demonstrated sensitivities of 87% and 85% for 30 main types and 54 histological subtypes, respectively, in leave-one-out cross validation, and 83% in a test set of 187 tumors representing 28 of the 30 main cancer types. These findings provide further support that broad and diverse tumor classification can be performed using a relatively compact gene set. An additional 300 consecutive cases submitted for clinical testing were profiled to characterize clinical utility in a real-world setting: the 92-gene assay confirmed 78% of samples having a single suspected primary tumor and provided a single molecular prediction in 74% of cases with two or more differential diagnoses. Further development of the 92-gene RT-PCR assay has resulted in a significant expansion in reportable tumor types and histological features with strong performance characteristics and supports the use of molecular classification as an objective standardized adjunct to current methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, GeneticFemaleGenes, NeoplasmHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReference StandardsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID21708287
PMCPMC3157614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.