Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21707404›Full record

ReviewFuture medicinal chemistry2011

Software and resources for computational medicinal chemistry.

Chenzhong Liao, Markus Sitzmann, Angelo Pugliese, Marc C Nicklaus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future medicinal chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chenzhong LiaoChemical Biology Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Frederick, MD 21702, USA. czliao@helix.nih.gov
Markus Sitzmann
Angelo Pugliese
Marc C Nicklaus

Funding

In Silico Screening for Cancer TargetsZICBC010639 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI NICKLAUS, MARC · 2009 to 2024
$4.2M
Large Databases of Small Molecules - Drug Development Tool and Public ResourceZICBC010517 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI NICKLAUS, MARC · 2009 to 2025
$3.7M
HIV Integrase Modeling and Computer-Aided Inhibitor DevelopmentZIABC010524 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI NICKLAUS, MARC · 2009 to 2024
$2.6M
Tools for Prediction of Drug Metabolism and MetabolitesZIABC011336 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI NICKLAUS, MARC · 2010 to 2020
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011336Intramural NIH HHS ZIC BC010517Intramural NIH HHS ZIC BC010639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-aided drug design plays a vital role in drug discovery and development and has become an indispensable tool in the pharmaceutical industry. Computational medicinal chemists can take advantage of all kinds of software and resources in the computer-aided drug design field for the purposes of discovering and optimizing biologically active compounds. This article reviews software and other resources related to computer-aided drug design approaches, putting particular emphasis on structure-based drug design, ligand-based drug design, chemical databases and chemoinformatics tools.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignDrug DesignSoftwareAnimalsDatabases, FactualHumansModels, MolecularQuantitative Structure-Activity Relationship

Identifiers

PMID21707404
PMCPMC3413324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.