Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21706341›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2012

Molecular genetic studies of gene identification for sarcopenia.

Li-Jun Tan, Shan-Lin Liu, Shu-Feng Lei, Christopher J Papasian, Hong-Wen Deng

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Li-Jun TanLaboratory of Molecular and Statistical Genetics and the Key Laboratory of Protein Chemistry and Developmental Biology of Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Shan-Lin Liu
Shu-Feng Lei
Christopher J Papasian
Hong-Wen Deng
Hunan Normal University · CNBeijing Jiaotong University · CNUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

Proteome-wide Expression Study of Osteogenic CellsP50AR055081 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2007 to 2012
$5.0M
ROBUST AND POWERFUL TEST OF CANDIDATE GENES TO BONE MASSR01AR050496 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2004 to 2013
$3.8M
Identification of Proteins Important for Male OsteoporosisR01AR057049 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2009 to 2013
$2.4M
Genomic search for bone mass QTLsR01AG026564 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2007 to 2010
$2.3M
Proteomics Study of Peripheral Blood Monocytes on OsteroporsisR21AG027110 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2006 to 2007
$367k
Canadian Institutes of Health Research 30811120436NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR055081NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050496-01NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR057049NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026564NIA NIH HHS R21 AG027110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcopenia, which is characterized by a progressive decrease of skeletal muscle mass and function with aging, is closely related to several common diseases (such as cardiovascular and airway diseases) and functional impairment/disability. Strong genetic determination has been reported for muscle mass and muscle strength, two most commonly recognized and studied risk phenotypes for sarcopenia, with heritability ranging from 30 to 85% for muscle strength and 45-90% for muscle mass. Sarcopenia has been the subject of increasing genetic research over the past decade. This review is designed to comprehensively summarize the most important and representative molecular genetic studies designed to identify genetic factors associated with sarcopenia. We have methodically reviewed whole-genome linkage studies in humans, quantitative trait loci mapping in animal models, candidate gene association studies, newly reported genome-wide association studies, DNA microarrays and microRNA studies of sarcopenia or related skeletal muscle phenotypes. The major results of each study are tabulated for easy comparison and reference. The findings of representative studies are discussed with respect to their influence on our present understanding of the genetics of sarcopenia. This is a comprehensive review of molecular genetic studies of gene identification for sarcopenia, and an overarching theme for this review is that the currently accumulating results are tentative and occasionally inconsistent and should be interpreted with caution pending further investigation. Consequently, this overview should enhance recognition of the need to validate/replicate the genetic variants underlying sarcopenia in large human cohorts and animal. We believe that further progress in understanding the genetic etiology of sarcopenia will provide valuable insights into important fundamental biological mechanisms underlying muscle physiology that will ultimately lead to improved ability to recognize individuals at risk for developing sarcopenia and our ability to treat this debilitating condition.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyGenesHumansMuscle, SkeletalSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID21706341
OpenAlexW2126535953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.