Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21706149›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2012

Biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy for patients with irinotecan-refractory and KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer according to epidermal growth factor receptor expression status.

Myoung Joo Kang, Yong Sang Hong, Kyu-pyo Kim, Sun Young Kim, Ji Yeon Baek, Min-Hee Ryu, Jae-Lyun Lee, Heung Moon Chang, Mi-Jung Kim, Hee Jin Chang and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00637091 (A Phase II Trial of Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan as a 2nd-line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure to Irinotecan That Express Wild-type KRAS With and Without Detectable EGFR Expression), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00637091 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Trial of Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan as a 2nd-line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure to Irinotecan That Express Wild-type KRAS With and Without Detectable EGFR Expression

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsan Medical CenterRan2008 to 2011Enrolled40ConditionsAdvanced Colorectal CancerArmsCetuximab, irinotecan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Current status of pharmacological treatment of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Myoung Joo KangDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 86 Asanbyeongwon-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Yong Sang Hong
Kyu-pyo Kim
Sun Young Kim
Ji Yeon Baek
Min-Hee Ryu
Jae-Lyun Lee
Heung Moon Chang
Mi-Jung Kim
Hee Jin Chang
Yoon-Koo Kang
Tae Won Kim
University of Ulsan · KRAsan Medical Center · KRNational Cancer Center · KRUlsan College · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCetuximab plus irinotecan has been shown to be effective in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with wild-type (WT) KRAS and positive EGFR expressions (EGFR+). Retrospective analysis revealed that the efficacy of cetuximab was similar in mCRC patients negative (EGFR-) and positive for EGFR. However, the efficacy of cetuximab has not been assessed prospectively in EGFR- mCRC patients.

methodsThis was a prospective, multicenter phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of biweekly cetuximab (500 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (150-180 mg/m(2)) in patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma with WT-KRAS and measurable lesion(s), either EGFR + or EGFR-, determined immunohistochemically, who failed first-line irinotecan-containing chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and the secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

resultsForty patients were enrolled; 20 EGFR + and 20 EGFR-; their baseline characteristics were balanced. The overall RR was 45% (18/40, 95% CI 29.6-60.4), 55% (11/20) in EGFR + and 35% (7/20) in EGFR- patients. Median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI 4.8-9.4), 8.3 months in EGFR + and 4.9 months in EGFR- patients. Median OS was 18.5 months (95% CI 15.2-21.8), 17.2 months in EGFR + and 18.5 months in EGFR- patients. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 5 patients (12.5%) and febrile neutropenia/skin rash/asthenia in 2 (5%).

conclusionsBiweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan as second-line treatment showed significant anti-tumor activity in patients with irinotecan-refractory mCRC and WT-KRAS regardless of EGFR expression status.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Administration ScheduleErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansIrinotecanKaplan-Meier EstimateAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinCetuximabErbB ReceptorsIrinotecanKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21706149
OpenAlexW2056555557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.