Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2012
Biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy for patients with irinotecan-refractory and KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer according to epidermal growth factor receptor expression status.
Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00637091 (A Phase II Trial of Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan as a 2nd-line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure to Irinotecan That Express Wild-type KRAS With and Without Detectable EGFR Expression), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Trial of Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan as a 2nd-line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure to Irinotecan That Express Wild-type KRAS With and Without Detectable EGFR Expression
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multicenter open-label randomized phase II study of second-line panitumumab and irinotecan with or without fluoropyrimidines in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (PACIFIC study).Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2019Trial
- Article
- Capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine in maintenance treatment for untreated characterised KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis in Chinese postmenopausal women.BMC gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Exploitation of Gene Expression and Cancer Biomarkers in Paving the Path to Era of Personalized Medicine.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2017Review
- Pragmatic issues in biomarker evaluation for targeted therapies in cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2015Review
- Effectiveness and safety of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ecancermedicalscience · 2015Review
- Current status of pharmacological treatment of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2014Article
- Second-line cetuximab/irinotecan versus oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidines for metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS.Cancer science · 2013Article
- Alternate dosing of cetuximab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR · 2013Article
- Targeted therapies in colorectal cancer-an integrative view by PPPM.The EPMA journal · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCetuximab plus irinotecan has been shown to be effective in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with wild-type (WT) KRAS and positive EGFR expressions (EGFR+). Retrospective analysis revealed that the efficacy of cetuximab was similar in mCRC patients negative (EGFR-) and positive for EGFR. However, the efficacy of cetuximab has not been assessed prospectively in EGFR- mCRC patients.
methodsThis was a prospective, multicenter phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of biweekly cetuximab (500 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (150-180 mg/m(2)) in patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma with WT-KRAS and measurable lesion(s), either EGFR + or EGFR-, determined immunohistochemically, who failed first-line irinotecan-containing chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and the secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
resultsForty patients were enrolled; 20 EGFR + and 20 EGFR-; their baseline characteristics were balanced. The overall RR was 45% (18/40, 95% CI 29.6-60.4), 55% (11/20) in EGFR + and 35% (7/20) in EGFR- patients. Median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI 4.8-9.4), 8.3 months in EGFR + and 4.9 months in EGFR- patients. Median OS was 18.5 months (95% CI 15.2-21.8), 17.2 months in EGFR + and 18.5 months in EGFR- patients. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 5 patients (12.5%) and febrile neutropenia/skin rash/asthenia in 2 (5%).
conclusionsBiweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan as second-line treatment showed significant anti-tumor activity in patients with irinotecan-refractory mCRC and WT-KRAS regardless of EGFR expression status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.