Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21705959›Full record

Trial reportPediatric research2011

Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in infancy reduces heart rate and positively affects distribution of attention.

John Colombo, Susan E Carlson, Carol L Cheatham, Kathleen M Fitzgerald-Gustafson, Amy Kepler, Tasha Doty

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) balance in developmental outcomes.Prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and essential fatty acids · 2017
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John ColomboDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA.
Susan E Carlson
Carol L Cheatham
Kathleen M Fitzgerald-Gustafson
Amy Kepler
Tasha Doty

Funding

Research Design and Analysis Core (RDAC)P30HD002528 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI FOWLER, STEPHEN CLETIUS · 1985 to 2015
$22.1M
DHA Supplementation and Pregnancy OutcomeR01HD047315 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CARLSON, SUSAN E, COLOMBO, JOHN A. · 2006 to 2016
$4.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD002528NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD047315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group prospective trial was conducted to determine whether a dose-response existed for four different levels of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation on the cognitive performance of infants. A total of 122 term infants were fed one of four different formulas varying in their DHA composition (0.00, 0.32, 0.64, and 0.96% of total fatty acids as DHA) from birth to 12 mo. The three DHA-supplemented formulas also contained 0.64% of total fatty acids as arachidonic acid (ARA, 20:4n-6). Infants were tested at 4, 6, and 9 mo of age on a visual habituation protocol that yielded both behavioral and psychophysiological indices of attention. Infants in all DHA+ARA-supplemented conditions had lower heart rates than those in the unsupplemented condition; there was no dose-response for this effect. The distribution of time that infants spent in different phases of attention (a cognitive index derived from the convergence of behavioral and cardiac responses) varied as a function of dosage. Infants supplemented at the two lower DHA doses spent proportionately more time engaged in active stimulus processing than infants fed the unsupplemented formula, whereas infants fed the highest dose were intermediate and did not differ from any other group.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimalsAttentionDocosahexaenoic AcidsDouble-Blind MethodFatty Acids, UnsaturatedHeart RateHumansInfantInfant FormulaNeuropsychological TestsProspective StudiesDocosahexaenoic AcidsFatty Acids, Unsaturated

Identifiers

PMID21705959
PMCPMC3172991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.