Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21705547›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011

Role of rpoS in the development of cell envelope resilience and pressure resistance in stationary-phase Escherichia coli.

Duangkamol Charoenwong, Simon Andrews, Bernard Mackey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acid adaptation increased the resistance ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cyclopropane Fatty Acids Are Important forInfection and immunity · 2022
    Article
  10. Heat and Pressure Resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The role ofInfection and drug resistance · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Duangkamol CharoenwongDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, The University of Reading, P.O. Box 226, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AP, United Kingdom.
Simon Andrews
Bernard Mackey
University of Reading · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work investigated the role of rpoS in the development of increased cell envelope resilience and enhanced pressure resistance in stationary-phase cells of Escherichia coli. Loss of both colony-forming ability and membrane integrity, measured as uptake of propidium iodide (PI), occurred at lower pressures in E. coli BW3709 (rpoS) than in the parental strain (BW2952). The rpoS mutant also released much higher concentrations of protein under pressure than the parent. We propose that RpoS-regulated functions are responsible for the increase in membrane resilience as cells enter stationary phase and that this plays a major role in the development of pressure resistance. Strains from the Keio collection with mutations in two RpoS-regulated genes, cfa (cyclopropane fatty acyl phospholipid synthase) and osmB (outer membrane lipoprotein), were significantly more pressure sensitive and took up more PI than the parent strain, with cfa having the greatest effect. Mutations in the bolA morphogene and other RpoS-regulated lipoprotein genes (osmC, osmE, osmY, and ybaY) had no effect on pressure resistance. The cytoplasmic membranes of the rpoS mutant failed to reseal after pressure treatment, and strains with mutations in osmB and nlpI (new lipoprotein) were also somewhat impaired in the ability to reseal their membranes. The cfa mutant, though pressure sensitive, was unaffected in membrane resealing, implying that the initial transient permeabilization event is critical for loss of viability rather than the failure to reseal. The enhanced pressure sensitivity of polA, recA, and xthA mutants suggested that DNA may be a target of oxidative stress in pressure-treated cells.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBase SequenceCell MembraneEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMutationOsmotic PressurePressurePropidiumSequence Analysis, DNASigma FactorStress, PhysiologicalBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsPropidiumSigma Factorsigma factor KatF protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID21705547
PMCPMC3147466
OpenAlexW2139332261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.