Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21704898›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2011

Is treatment of feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy based in science or faith? A survey of cardiologists and a literature search.

Mark Rishniw, Paul D Pion

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Feline comorbidities: cardiovascular and kidney diseases.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. The genetic basis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in cats and humans.Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology · 2015
    Review
  12. Science, faith or something else?Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark RishniwVeterinary Information Network, Davis, CA 95616, USA. mr89@cornell.edu
Paul D Pion

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

practical relevanceFeline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common cardiac disease of cats. Treatment of HCM is usually directed at controlling signs of congestive heart failure (CHF), preventing occurrence or recurrence of systemic thromboembolism or delaying/preventing/reversing progression of subclinical disease. STUDY OBJECTIVE AND

designDespite the laudable goals of therapy, however, little objective evidence supporting therapeutic decisions has been published. We, therefore, hypothesized that cardiologists base their treatment strategies on information other than published clinically relevant science. To gain insight into therapeutic decisions that cardiologists and clinicians with an interest in cardiology (n=99) make for cats with HCM, and on what information they base these decisions, we presented participants with, and asked them to select therapy for, 12 hypothetical scenarios of HCM (± CHF). Responses and justifications for treatment choices were compiled and compared with the results of a comprehensive literature search for published information about treatment of feline HCM.

findingsEvaluation of the therapeutic strategies chosen for these hypothetical cases of HCM suggests that cardiologists or clinicians with a strong interest in cardiology often prescribe treatments knowing that little documented evidence supports their decisions.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Veterinary MedicineAnimalsCardiologyCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicCat DiseasesCatsEvidence-Based MedicineHealth Care SurveysRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReligion and MedicineScience

Identifiers

PMID21704898
PMCPMC11107977
OpenAlexW2108246094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.