Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21703289›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2012

Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: III. Anticipatory contrast for sucrose and corn oil.

Nu-Chu Liang, Ralph Norgren, Patricia S Grigson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Thalamic contribution to cortical processing of taste and expectation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nu-Chu LiangDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA 17033, USA. nliang2@jhmi.edu
Ralph Norgren
Patricia S Grigson

Funding

NEURAL SYSTEMS OF INGESTIVE BEHAVIORR01DC000240 · NIDCD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI HAJNAL, ANDRAS · 1989 to 2014
$5.1M
DRUGS OF ABUSE, REWARD COMPARISON, AND THE THALAMUSR01DA012473 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI GRIGSON, PATRICIA SUE · 2000 to 2010
$2.9M
DRUGS OF ABUSE AND LEARNED AVERSIONS: SOLVING A PARADOXR01DA009815 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI GRIGSON, PATRICIA SUE · 1996 to 2011
$2.3M
Neural Mechansims of Oil RewardR01DK079182 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI NORGREN, RALPH · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS DA012473NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA009815NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012473NIDCD NIH HHS DC00240NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000240NIDDK NIH HHS DK079182NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An anticipatory contrast effect (ACE) occurs when, across daily trials, an animal comes to respond less than normally to a first stimulus when it is followed shortly by a second, more preferred solution. Classically, ACE is studied using a low (L) concentration of saccharin or sucrose, followed by access to a higher (H) concentration of sucrose. Subjects in the control condition have two bouts of access to the weaker solution presented on the same schedule. The ACE is measured by the difference in intake of the first bout low solution between subjects in the low-low (L-L) vs. the low-high (L-H) conditions. Here we used this paradigm with sham feeding rats and determined that nutritional feedback was unnecessary for the development of ACE with two concentrations of sucrose or with two concentrations of corn oil. Next we showed that ibotenic acid lesions centered in the orosensory thalamus spared ACEs for both sucrose and corn oil. In contrast, lesions of the pontine parabrachial nuclei (PBN), the second central relay for taste in the rat, disrupted ACEs for both sucrose and corn oil. Although the sensory modalities needed for the oral detection of fats remain controversial, it appears that the PBN is involved in processing the comparison of disparate concentrations of sucrose and oil reward.

Indexed as

RewardAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantCorn OilDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrinking BehaviorFood PreferencesMaleMotivationPonsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeSaccharinCorn OilSaccharinSucroseSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID21703289
PMCPMC3206999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.