Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21703023›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2011

Reconsidering low-dose aspirin therapy for cardiovascular disease: a study protocol for physician and patient behavioral change.

Brittany Folks, William G Leblanc, Elizabeth W Staton, Wilson D Pace

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01247454 (Risk Informed Intervention Development and Implementation of Safe Ambulatory Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01247454 nacompletednot on this map

Risk Informed Intervention Development and Implementation of Safe Ambulatory Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2009 to 2010Enrolled7,000ConditionsCardiovascular DiseaseArmsacademic detailing, Electronic Health Record (EHR) prompt, EHR prompt and patient prompt
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Driven Ambulatory Aspirin Deprescribing Protocol.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brittany FolksUniversity of Colorado Denver, Department of Family Medicine, 12681 East 17th Ave, Bldg. A01, Mail Stop 496, Aurora, CO 80045-0508, USA.
William G Leblanc
Elizabeth W Staton
Wilson D Pace
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are often disparities between current evidence and current practice. Decreasing the gap between desired practice outcomes and observed practice outcomes in the healthcare system is not always easy. Stopping previously recommended or variably recommended interventions may be even harder to achieve than increasing the use of a desired but under-performed activity. For over a decade, aspirin has been prescribed for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and for patients with the coronary artery disease risk equivalents; yet, there is no substantial evidence of an appropriate risk-benefit ratio to support this practice. This paper describes the protocol of a randomized trial being conducted in six primary care practices in the Denver metropolitan area to examine the effectiveness of three interventional strategies to change physician behavior regarding prescription of low-dose aspirin.

methodsAll practices received academic detailing, one arm received clinician reminders to reconsider aspirin, a second arm received both clinician and patient messages to reconsider aspirin. The intervention will run for 15 to 18 months. Data collected at baseline and for outcomes from an electronic health record will be used to assess pre- and post-interventional prescribing, as well as to explore any inappropriate decrease in aspirin use by patients with known cardiovascular disease. DISCUSSION: This study was designed to investigate effective methods of changing physician behavior to decrease the use of aspirin for primary cardiovascular disease prevention. The results of this study will contribute to the small pool of knowledge currently available on the topic of ceasing previously supported practices.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01247454.

Indexed as

AspirinCardiovascular DiseasesClinical ProtocolsColoradoCoronary Artery DiseaseDecision Support TechniquesEducation, Medical, ContinuingHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Aspirin

Identifiers

PMID21703023
PMCPMC3141566
OpenAlexW2163363279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.