ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2011
Allele coding in genomic evaluation.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- MetaGS: an accurate method to impute and combine SNP effects across populations using summary statistics.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Pooled it
- Targeted allele frequency tuning in breeding populations via alternative optimum contribution selection.Genetics · 2026Article
- Genomic selection strategies and their potential to maintain rare alleles and de-novo mutations: a long-term assessment.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Integrative multi-environmental genomic prediction in apple.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Article
- Complex traits and candidate genes: estimation of genetic variance components across multiple genetic architectures.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Reliabilities of estimated breeding values in models with metafounders.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Theoretical accuracy for indirect predictions based on SNP effects from single-step GBLUP.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Single-step genomic BLUP with genetic groups and automatic adjustment for allele coding.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- The long-term effects of genomic selection: 1. Response to selection, additive genetic variance, and genetic architecture.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Phantom Epistasis in Genomic Selection: On the Predictive Ability of Epistatic Models.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Current status of genomic evaluation.Journal of animal science · 2020Review
- Genomic Prediction of Columnaris Disease Resistance in Catfish.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- A Review of Genomic Models for the Analysis of Livestock Crossbred Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Statistical methods for SNP heritability estimation and partition: A review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.Journal of animal science · 2019Article
- Lost in Translation: On the Problem of Data Coding in Penalized Whole Genome Regression with Interactions.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Modeling copy number variation in the genomic prediction of maize hybrids.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019Article
- Genomic Prediction Using Individual-Level Data and Summary Statistics from Multiple Populations.Genetics · 2018Article
- Estimates of genetic trend for single-step genomic evaluations.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic data are used in animal breeding to assist genetic evaluation. Several models to estimate genomic breeding values have been studied. In general, two approaches have been used. One approach estimates the marker effects first and then, genomic breeding values are obtained by summing marker effects. In the second approach, genomic breeding values are estimated directly using an equivalent model with a genomic relationship matrix. Allele coding is the method chosen to assign values to the regression coefficients in the statistical model. A common allele coding is zero for the homozygous genotype of the first allele, one for the heterozygote, and two for the homozygous genotype for the other allele. Another common allele coding changes these regression coefficients by subtracting a value from each marker such that the mean of regression coefficients is zero within each marker. We call this centered allele coding. This study considered effects of different allele coding methods on inference. Both marker-based and equivalent models were considered, and restricted maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods were used in inference.
resultsTheoretical derivations showed that parameter estimates and estimated marker effects in marker-based models are the same irrespective of the allele coding, provided that the model has a fixed general mean. For the equivalent models, the same results hold, even though different allele coding methods lead to different genomic relationship matrices. Calculated genomic breeding values are independent of allele coding when the estimate of the general mean is included into the values. Reliabilities of estimated genomic breeding values calculated using elements of the inverse of the coefficient matrix depend on the allele coding because different allele coding methods imply different models. Finally, allele coding affects the mixing of Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms, with the centered coding being the best.
conclusionsDifferent allele coding methods lead to the same inference in the marker-based and equivalent models when a fixed general mean is included in the model. However, reliabilities of genomic breeding values are affected by the allele coding method used. The centered coding has some numerical advantages when Markov chain Monte Carlo methods are used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.