Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21702580›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2011

Exploration of the relationship between topology and designability of conformations.

Sumudu P Leelananda, Fadi Towfic, Robert L Jernigan, Andrzej Kloczkowski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Predicting Designability of Small Proteins from Graph Features of Contact Maps.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2016
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Sequence evolution correlates with structural dynamics.Molecular biology and evolution · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sumudu P LeelanandaL. H. Baker Center for Bioinformatics and Biological Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA.
Fadi Towfic
Robert L Jernigan
Andrzej Kloczkowski
Iowa State University · USBattelle · US

Funding

Coarse-Grained Models of ProteinsR01GM072014 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L · 2004 to 2012
$2.3M
Modeling Ribosomal Control, Function and AssemblyR01GM073095 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L · 2006 to 2009
$1.0M
High-Accuracy Protein Models Derived from Lower Resolution DataR01GM081680 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KLOCZKOWSKI, ANDRZEJ · 2007 to 2009
$763k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072014NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM072014NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073095NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM073095NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081680NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM081680NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM081680-S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein structures are evolutionarily more conserved than sequences, and sequences with very low sequence identity frequently share the same fold. This leads to the concept of protein designability. Some folds are more designable and lots of sequences can assume that fold. Elucidating the relationship between protein sequence and the three-dimensional (3D) structure that the sequence folds into is an important problem in computational structural biology. Lattice models have been utilized in numerous studies to model protein folds and predict the designability of certain folds. In this study, all possible compact conformations within a set of two-dimensional and 3D lattice spaces are explored. Complementary interaction graphs are then generated for each conformation and are described using a set of graph features. The full HP sequence space for each lattice model is generated and contact energies are calculated by threading each sequence onto all the possible conformations. Unique conformation giving minimum energy is identified for each sequence and the number of sequences folding to each conformation (designability) is obtained. Machine learning algorithms are used to predict the designability of each conformation. We find that the highly designable structures can be distinguished from other non-designable conformations based on certain graphical geometric features of the interactions. This finding confirms the fact that the topology of a conformation is an important determinant of the extent of its designability and suggests that the interactions themselves are important for determining the designability.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID21702580
PMCPMC3133807
OpenAlexW1999694653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.