ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2011
Warfarin drug interactions: a comparative evaluation of the lists provided by five information sources.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consumption of medicinal plants by patients with heart diseases at a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic in Brazil.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016Trial
- Construction and Validation of a Protocol Targeting Patients on Oral Anticoagulation with Warfarin.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Article
- Drug Interactions Affecting Oral Anticoagulant Use.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2022Review
- Assessing Consistency of Drug-Drug Interaction-Related Information Across Various Drug Information Resources.Cureus · 2021Article
- Instruments for the assessment of patient adherence to oral anticoagulation with warfarin protocol for a systematic review.Medicine · 2019Article
- Determination of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions Using Various Software Programs in a Community Pharmacy Setting.Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2019Article
- Drug-Induced Nephrotoxicity and Dose Adjustment Recommendations: Agreement Among Four Drug Information Sources.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015Article
- Rifampicin-warfarin interaction leading to macroscopic hematuria: a case report and review of the literature.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2013Review
- Agreement among four drug information sources for the occurrence of warfarin drug interactions in Brazilian heart disease patients with a high prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDetecting potential drug interactions can lead to early interventions that protect patients from serious drug-related problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement among the lists of warfarin interactions provided by five information sources.
methodsThe lists of warfarin interactions and the corresponding severity ratings and documentation levels presented by the three compendia and by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model Formulary were all compared, and each list was compared to that provided on the package insert of Marevan, a brand of warfarin. The compendia used were: Drug Interaction Facts, Drug Interactions: Analysis and Management and DRUG-REAX. A kappa coefficient was used to calculate the agreement among the sources.
resultsA total of 537 interactions were listed. Only 13 (2.4%) were common to the five sources. The global Fleiss' kappa coefficient was -0.0080, which indicated poor agreement. Eleven warfarin interactions appeared only in the Marevan package insert. Importantly, 243 interactions (45.3% of the total) were deemed significant in at least one compendium. Only two warfarin interactions were reported as critical by all three compendia and by WHO. The most critical interactions cited by the compendia were missing from the package insert.
conclusionsPoor agreement was found among five sources listing warfarin interactions. Potentially severe clinical consequences might occur due to these discrepant recommendations. Finally, the lack of standard terminology and clinical guidance, as well as the possible inaccuracy of severity ratings and documentation might contribute to heterogeneous procedures in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.