Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21701872›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2011

Is intravascular ultrasound beneficial for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions? Evidence from a 4,314-patient registry.

Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Imad Sheiban, Enrico Romagnoli, Stefano De Servi, Corrado Tamburino, Antonio Colombo, Francesco Burzotta, Patrizia Presbitero, Leonardo Bolognese, Leonardo Paloscia and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Understanding the economic impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Treatment of coronary de novo bifurcation lesions with DCB only strategy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians: pros and cons.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe Biondi-ZoccaiDivision of Cardiology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. gbiondizoccai@gmail.com
Imad Sheiban
Enrico Romagnoli
Stefano De Servi
Corrado Tamburino
Antonio Colombo
Francesco Burzotta
Patrizia Presbitero
Leonardo Bolognese
Leonardo Paloscia
Paolo Rubino
Gennaro Sardella
Carlo Briguori
Luigi Niccoli
Gianfranco Franco
Domenico Di Girolamo
Luigi Piatti
Cesare Greco
Davide Capodanno
Giuseppe Sangiorgi
Ferrarotto Hospital · ITAlessandro Manzoni Hospital · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Civile di Legnano · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITClinica Mediterranea · ITEMO GVM Centro Cuore Columbus · ITFondazione Humanitas per la Ricerca · ITOspedale di Santo Spirito · ITOspedale San Donato · ITPoliclinico Casilino · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary bifurcations remain a challenging lesion subset for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is unclear whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance can improve PCI results in bifurcations. We aimed to compare IVUS-guided PCI versus standard PCI in a large registry of patients undergoing PCI for bifurcations in the drug-eluting stent era.

methodsA multicenter, retrospective study was conducted enrolling consecutive patients undergoing bifurcation PCI between January 2002 and December 2006 at 22 centers. The primary end-point was the long term rate of major adverse cardiac events [MACE, i.e. death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization (TLR)].

resultsA total of 4,314 patients were included, 226 (5.2%) undergoing IVUS-guided PCI, and 4,088 (94.8%) standard PCI. Early (30-day) outcomes were similar in the two groups, with MACE in 1.3 versus 2.1%, respectively, death in 0.9 versus 1.0%, and stent thrombosis in 0 versus 0.6% (all p > 0.05). After 24 ± 15 months, unadjusted rates of MACE were 17.7 versus 16.4%, with death in 2.7 versus 4.9%, myocardial infarction in 4.4 versus 3.7%, TLR in 15.0 versus 12.3%, and stent thrombosis in 3.1 versus 2.7% (all p > 0.05). Even at multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis with propensity score adjustment, IVUS was not associated with any statistically significant impact on the risk of MACE, death, myocardial infarction, TLR (neither on the main branch nor on the side branch), or stent thrombosis (all p > 0.05).

conclusionsDespite a sound rationale to choose stent size, optimize stent expansion and guide kissing inflation, IVUS usage during PCI for coronary bifurcation lesions was not associated with significant clinical benefits in this large retrospective study.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedChi-Square DistributionCoronary Artery DiseaseDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID21701872
OpenAlexW2100739098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.