Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21701808›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2011

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-centre experience of 120 cases.

Daniel W Good, James M O'Riordan, Diarmaid Moran, Frank B Keane, Emmanuel Eguare, Diarmuid S O'Riordain, Paul C Neary

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The implementation of a standardized approach to laparoscopic rectal surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel W GoodMinimally Invasive Surgical Unit, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Adelaide and Meath Incorporating the National Childrens Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland. goodd@tcd.ie
James M O'Riordan
Diarmaid Moran
Frank B Keane
Emmanuel Eguare
Diarmuid S O'Riordain
Paul C Neary

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor colorectal surgeons, laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery poses a new challenge. The defence of the questionable oncological safety tempered by the impracticality of the long learning curve is rapidly fading. As a unit specialising in minimally invasive surgery, we have routinely undertaken rectal cancer surgery laparoscopically since 2005.

methodsPatients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer between June 2005 and February 2010 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database.

resultsOne hundred and thirty patients underwent surgery for rectal cancer during the study period. One hundred and twenty patients had a laparoscopic resection, six were converted to open (conversion rate 5%) and 10 had a planned primary open procedure. Fifty four were low rectal tumours and 76 were upper rectal tumours. One hundred and thirteen patients had an anterior resection (87%), 17 patients an abdomino-perineal resection (13%) and 62 of the 130 patients (47.6%) had neoadjuvant radiotherapy. The median lymph node retrieval rate was 12 (9-14), five patients (3.8%) had a positive circumferential margin and the clinical anastomotic leak rate was 3.8% (n = 5 patients). There was no significant difference in the stated parameters for neoadjuvant versus non-neoadjuvant patients and for upper versus lower rectal tumours. Ninety three percent of mesorectal excision specimens were complete on pathological assessment.

conclusionsDuring the study period, 92% of rectal cancers underwent a laparoscopic resection with low rates of morbidity and acceptable short-term oncological outcomes. This data supports the view that laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer can be safely delivered in mid-volume centres by surgeons who have completed the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingRectal NeoplasmsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.