Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21701511›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2011

DNA interstrand crosslink repair and cancer.

Andrew J Deans, Stephen C West

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 596 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
596citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

596 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Treatment of Fanconi Anemia-Associated Head and Neck Cancer: Opportunities to Improve Outcomes.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

536 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew J DeansLondon Research Institute, Cancer Research UK, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms EN63LD, UK.
Stephen C West

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11582European Research Council 249145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are highly toxic DNA lesions that prevent transcription and replication by inhibiting DNA strand separation. Agents that induce ICLs were one of the earliest, and are still the most widely used, forms of chemotherapeutic drug. Only recently, however, have we begun to understand how cells repair these lesions. Important insights have come from studies of individuals with Fanconi anaemia (FA), a rare genetic disorder that leads to ICL sensitivity. Understanding how the FA pathway links nucleases, helicases and other DNA-processing enzymes should lead to more targeted uses of ICL-inducing agents in cancer treatment and could provide novel insights into drug resistance.

Indexed as

DNA RepairAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCross-Linking ReagentsDNA DamageDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFanconi AnemiaHumansNeoplasmsRecombination, GeneticAntineoplastic AgentsCross-Linking Reagents

Identifiers

PMID21701511
PMCPMC3560328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.