Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21701502›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2011

Novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of heart failure.

Juan Tamargo, José López-Sendón

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Role of local angiotensin II signaling in bladder function.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. I-Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Renin Activity in Heart Failure with Reduced Systolic Function-New Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Adenosine ADrug design, development and therapy · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Juan TamargoDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain. jtamargo@med.ucm.es
José López-Sendón

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite considerable therapeutic advances, heart failure remains a medical and socioeconomic problem. Thus, there is a compelling need for new drugs that could improve clinical outcomes. In recent years, new potential therapeutic targets that are involved in the pathogenesis of heart failure have been identified, and new drugs are currently under investigation. A repeated finding is that the positive results that have been observed in preclinical studies and Phase II trials are not always confirmed in Phase III studies. This Review analyses the new therapeutic targets (for example, ventricular remodelling, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation, defects in Ca(2+) cycling, and so on), the mechanism of action, efficacy and future perspectives of new drugs that are currently under development for the treatment of heart failure, and the possible explanations for the discrepancy between Phase II and Phase III trials.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsClinical Trials as TopicComorbidityDiureticsHeart FailureHumansMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsNatriuretic PeptidesRenin-Angiotensin SystemTreatment OutcomeVasodilator AgentsVentricular RemodelingAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsDiureticsMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsNatriuretic PeptidesVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID21701502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.