Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21699987›Full record

SynthesisNeuroImage2011

Naturalizing aesthetics: brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities.

Steven Brown, Xiaoqing Gao, Loren Tisdelle, Simon B Eickhoff, Mario Liotti

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NeuroImage, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Dynamics of brain networks in the aesthetic appreciation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Trial
  10. Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Why do we believe in fairies?Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steven BrownDepartment of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. stebro@mcmaster.ca
Xiaoqing Gao
Loren Tisdelle
Simon B Eickhoff
Mario Liotti

Funding

Meta-anaylsis in human brain mappingR01MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2006 to 2024
$10.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074457NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH074457-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present here the most comprehensive analysis to date of neuroaesthetic processing by reporting the results of voxel-based meta-analyses of 93 neuroimaging studies of positive-valence aesthetic appraisal across four sensory modalities. The results demonstrate that the most concordant area of activation across all four modalities is the right anterior insula, an area typically associated with visceral perception, especially of negative valence (disgust, pain, etc.). We argue that aesthetic processing is, at its core, the appraisal of the valence of perceived objects. This appraisal is in no way limited to artworks but is instead applicable to all types of perceived objects. Therefore, one way to naturalize aesthetics is to argue that such a system evolved first for the appraisal of objects of survival advantage, such as food sources, and was later co-opted in humans for the experience of artworks for the satisfaction of social needs.

Indexed as

ArtAuditory PerceptionBeautyBrainBrain MappingEstheticsHumansLikelihood FunctionsMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural PathwaysPositron-Emission TomographyPrefrontal CortexSensationSmellTasteVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID21699987
PMCPMC8005853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.