Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21699807›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2011

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography does not reliably distinguish IgG4-associated cholangitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis or cholangiocarcinoma.

Evangelos Kalaitzakis, Michael Levy, Terumi Kamisawa, Gavin J Johnson, Todd H Baron, Mark D Topazian, Naoki Takahashi, Atsushi Kanno, Kazuichi Okazaki, Naoto Egawa and 10 more

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis (2021)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Clinical practice guidelines for IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2019
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Autoimmune pancreatitis: What we know so far.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis.Clinical liver disease · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. IgG4-related hepatobiliary disease: an overview.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Evangelos KalaitzakisDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Michael Levy
Terumi Kamisawa
Gavin J Johnson
Todd H Baron
Mark D Topazian
Naoki Takahashi
Atsushi Kanno
Kazuichi Okazaki
Naoto Egawa
Kazushige Uchida
Kashif Sheikh
Zahir Amin
Tooru Shimosegawa
Neomal S Sandanayake
Nicholas I Church
Michael H Chapman
Stephen P Pereira
Suresh Chari
George J M Webster
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity College Hospital · GBKansai Medical University · JPTohoku University · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JPUCL Australia · AUUniversity College London · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

Small Molecule Enhancers of Photodynamic Therapy for Skin CancerP01CA084203 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Bryan Quilty Spring · 2001 to 2026
$27.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA084203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsDistinction of immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis (IAC) from primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) or cholangiocarcinoma is challenging. We aimed to assess the performance characteristics of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) for the diagnosis of IAC.

methodsSeventeen physicians from centers in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom, unaware of clinical data, reviewed 40 preselected ERCs of patients with IAC (n = 20), PSC (n = 10), and cholangiocarcinoma (n = 10). The performance characteristics of ERC for IAC diagnosis as well as the κ statistic for intraobserver and interobserver agreement were calculated.

resultsThe overall specificity, sensitivity, and interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of IAC were 88%, 45%, and 0.18, respectively. Reviewer origin, specialty, or years of experience had no statistically significant effect on reporting success. The overall intraobserver agreement was fair (0.74). The operating characteristics of different ERC features for the diagnosis of IAC were poor.

conclusionsDespite high specificity of ERC for diagnosing IAC, sensitivity is poor, suggesting that many patients with IAC may be misdiagnosed with PSC or cholangiocarcinoma. Additional diagnostic strategies are likely to be vital in distinguishing these diseases.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangiocarcinomaCholangitisDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ErrorsHumansImmunoglobulin GJapanSensitivity and SpecificityUnited KingdomUnited StatesImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID21699807
PMCPMC3246637
OpenAlexW2007871949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.