Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21699739›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2011

Impact of established prognostic factors and molecular subtype in very young breast cancer patients: pooled analysis of four EORTC randomized controlled trials.

Jos A van der Hage, J Sven D Mieog, Cornelis J H van de Velde, Hein Putter, Harry Bartelink, Marc J van de Vijver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Aging and CNS Myeloid Cell Depletion Attenuate Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 10-Year Breast Cancer Outcomes in Women ≤35 Years of Age.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Validation of the 8Aging · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Correlation of NGX6 expression with clinicopathologic features and prognosis in colon cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Relationship between chemotherapy and prognosis in different subtypes of node-negative breast cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Article
  20. Breast cancer: Actual methods of treatment and future trends.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jos A van der HageDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Sven D Mieog
Cornelis J H van de Velde
Hein Putter
Harry Bartelink
Marc J van de Vijver

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionYoung age at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer is an independent factor of poor prognosis. In many treatment guidelines, the recommendation is to treat young patients with adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of tumor characteristics. However, limited data on prognostic factors are available for young breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of established clinical and pathological prognostic factors in young breast cancer patients.

methodsData from four European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) clinical trials were pooled, resulting in a dataset consisting of 9,938 early breast cancer patients with a median follow-up of 11 years. For 549 patients aged less than 40 years at the time of diagnosis, including 341 node negative patients who did not receive chemotherapy, paraffin tumor blocks were processed for immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Cox proportional hazard analysis was applied to assess the association of clinical and pathological factors with overall and distant metastasis free survival.

resultsFor young patients, tumor size (P = 0.01), nodal status (P = 0.006) and molecular subtype (P = 0.02) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. In the node negative subgroup, only molecular subtype was a prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.02). Young node negative patients bearing luminal A tumors had an overall survival rate of 94% at 10 years' follow-up compared to 72% for patients with basal-type tumors.

conclusionsMolecular subtype is a strong independent prognostic factor in breast cancer patients younger than 40 years of age. These data support the use of established prognostic factors as a diagnostic tool to assess disease outcome and to plan systemic treatment strategies in young breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID21699739
PMCPMC3218957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.