ArticleImplementation science : IS2011
Collaborations for leadership in applied health research and care: lessons from the theory of communities of practice.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Learning from the emergence of NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs): a systematic review of evaluations.Implementation science : IS · 2018Pooled it
- Enhancing the Innovation Ecosystem: Overcoming Challenges to Introducing Information-Driven Technologies in Health Care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Achieving research impact in medical research through collaboration across organizational boundaries: Insights from a mixed methods study in the Netherlands.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Using digital platforms to promote a healthcare provider community of practice for abortion care in Uganda.Reproductive health · 2023Article
- Exploring the evidence base for Communities of Practice in health research and translation: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Interprofessional Identity in Health and Social Care: Analysis and Synthesis of the Assumptions and Conceptions in the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Core components of a Community of Practice to improve community health worker performance: a qualitative study.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- What makes a 'successful' collaborative research project between public health practitioners and academics? A mixed-methods review of funding applications submitted to a local intervention evaluation scheme.Health research policy and systems · 2021Article
- Working together to co-produce better health: The experience of the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London.Journal of health services research & policy · 2021Article
- Article
- Knowledge mobilisation in practice: an evaluation of the Australian Prevention Partnership Centre.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- Naturopathy Special Interest Group Research Capacity and Needs Assessment Survey.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- How do NHS organisations plan research capacity development? Strategies, strengths, and opportunities for improvement.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- The knowledge mobilisation challenge: does producing evidence lead to its adoption within dentistry?British dental journal · 2018Article
- Initiating communities of practice for teaching and education scholarship in hospital settings: a multi-site case study.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2018Article
- Improving the production of applied health research findings: insights from a qualitative study of operational research.Implementation science : IS · 2017Article
- The 'dark side' of knowledge brokering.Journal of health services research & policy · 2017Article
- Building capacity to use and undertake research in health organisations: a survey of training needs and priorities among staff.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Learning from doing: the case for combining normalisation process theory and participatory learning and action research methodology for primary healthcare implementation research.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice.Implementation science : IS · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe paper combines the analytical and instrumental perspectives on communities of practice (CoPs) to reflect on potential challenges that may arise in the process of interprofessional and inter-organisational joint working within the Collaborations for Leaderships in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs)--partnerships between the universities and National Health Service (NHS) Trusts aimed at conducting applied health research and translating its findings into day-to-day clinical practice. DISCUSSION: The paper discusses seminal theoretical literature on CoPs as well as previous empirical research on the role of these communities in healthcare collaboration, which is organised around the following three themes: knowledge sharing within and across CoPs, CoP formation and manageability, and identity building in CoPs. It argues that the multiprofessional and multi-agency nature of the CLAHRCs operating in the traditionally demarcated organisational landscape of the NHS may present formidable obstacles to knowledge sharing between various professional groupings, formation of a shared 'collaborative' identity, and the development of new communities within the CLAHRCs. To cross multiple boundaries between various professional and organisational communities and hence enable the flow of knowledge, the CLAHRCs will have to create an effective system of 'bridges' involving knowledge brokers, boundary objects, and cross-disciplinary interactions as well as address a number of issues related to professional and organisational identification. SUMMARY: The CoP approach can complement traditional 'stage-of-change' theories used in the field of implementation research and provide a basis for designing theory-informed interventions and evaluations. It can help to illuminate multiple boundaries that exist between professional and organisational groups within the CLAHRCs and suggest ways of crossing those boundaries to enable knowledge transfer and organisational learning. Achieving the aims of the CLAHRCs and producing a sustainable change in the ways applied health research is conducted and implemented may be influenced by how effectively these organisations can navigate through the multiple CoPs involved and promote the development of new multiprofessional and multi-organisational communities united by shared practice and a shared sense of belonging--an assumption that needs to be explored by further empirical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.